LPLA 2012.06.30 10-Q
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
| |
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
or
|
| |
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-34963
LPL Financial Holdings Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| |
Delaware | 20-3717839 |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) |
75 State Street, Boston, MA 02109
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
(617) 423-3644
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
LPL Investment Holdings Inc.
One Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02108
(Former name, Former address)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
| | | |
Large accelerated filer x | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
| | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No
The number of shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding as of July 17, 2012 was 111,069,074.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). You may read and copy any document we file with the SEC at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, U.S.A. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. Our SEC filings are also available to the public from the SEC’s internet site at http://www.sec.gov.
On our Internet website, http://www.lpl.com, we post the following filings as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC: our annual reports on Form 10-K, our proxy statements, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Hard copies of all such filings are available free of charge by request via email (investor.relations@lpl.com), telephone (617) 897-4574, or mail (LPL Financial Investor Relations at 75 State Street, 24th Floor, Boston, MA 02109). The information contained or incorporated on our website is not a part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
When we use the terms “LPLFH”, “we”, “us”, “our”, the “firm” and the "Company," we mean LPL Financial Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries, taken as a whole, unless the context otherwise indicates.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Statements in Item 2 - “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and other sections of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q regarding the Company's future financial and operating results, growth, business strategy, projected costs, plans, liquidity and ability and plans to pay future dividends, as well as any other statements that are not purely historical, constitute forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on the Company's historical performance and its plans, estimates and expectations as of August 1, 2012. The words “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “plans,” “predicts,” “will” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees that the future results, plans or expectations expressed or implied by the Company will be achieved. Matters subject to forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, including economic, legislative, regulatory, competitive and other factors, which may cause actual financial or operating results, levels of activity, or the timing of events, to be materially different than those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include: changes in general economic and financial market conditions; fluctuations in the value of assets under management; effects of competition in the financial services industry; changes in the number of the Company's financial advisors and institutions, and their ability to market effectively financial products and services; the Company's success in integrating the operations of acquired businesses; the effect of current, pending and future legislation, regulation and regulatory actions; and the other factors set forth in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company's 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For example, the Company may be unable to successfully integrate the systems and operations related to our acquisitions of Concord Wealth Management, Fortigent Holdings Company, Inc. and Veritat Advisors Inc. and realize the expected synergies from these transactions. Except as required by law, the Company specifically disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of developments occurring after the date of this quarterly report, even if its estimates change, and you should not rely on those statements as representing the Company's views as of any date subsequent to the date of this quarterly report.
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
REVENUES: | | | | | | | | |
Commissions | | $ | 447,243 |
| | $ | 459,882 |
| | $ | 910,896 |
| | $ | 911,759 |
|
Advisory fees | | 268,192 |
| | 264,289 |
| | 519,173 |
| | 508,376 |
|
Asset-based fees | | 102,784 |
| | 90,504 |
| | 200,025 |
| | 180,327 |
|
Transaction and other fees | | 78,894 |
| | 68,755 |
| | 153,466 |
| | 142,504 |
|
Interest income, net of interest expense | | 4,800 |
| | 5,110 |
| | 9,510 |
| | 10,252 |
|
Other | | 5,930 |
| | 5,456 |
| | 16,546 |
| | 14,647 |
|
Total net revenues | | 907,843 |
| | 893,996 |
| | 1,809,616 |
| | 1,767,865 |
|
EXPENSES: | | | | | | | | |
|
Commissions and advisory fees | | 620,582 |
| | 624,687 |
| | 1,237,974 |
| | 1,219,365 |
|
Compensation and benefits | | 93,034 |
| | 81,410 |
| | 182,046 |
| | 165,552 |
|
Promotional | | 26,122 |
| | 14,789 |
| | 42,953 |
| | 34,325 |
|
Depreciation and amortization | | 17,412 |
| | 18,407 |
| | 34,587 |
| | 36,572 |
|
Professional services | | 18,199 |
| | 12,489 |
| | 31,320 |
| | 22,653 |
|
Occupancy and equipment |
| 14,007 |
| | 12,394 |
| | 28,504 |
| | 27,919 |
|
Brokerage, clearing and exchange | | 9,554 |
| | 9,401 |
| | 19,069 |
| | 19,050 |
|
Communications and data processing | | 9,797 |
| | 8,906 |
| | 18,696 |
| | 17,588 |
|
Regulatory fees and expenses | | 6,891 |
| | 6,372 |
| | 14,437 |
| | 12,944 |
|
Restructuring charges | | 2,057 |
| | 4,814 |
| | 3,751 |
| | 5,351 |
|
Other | | 9,441 |
| | 6,694 |
| | 16,113 |
| | 13,183 |
|
Total operating expenses | | 827,096 |
| | 800,363 |
| | 1,629,450 |
| | 1,574,502 |
|
Non-operating interest expense | | 13,439 |
| | 18,154 |
| | 29,471 |
| | 36,326 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt | | — |
| | — |
| | 16,524 |
| | — |
|
Total expenses | | 840,535 |
| | 818,517 |
| | 1,675,445 |
| | 1,610,828 |
|
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES | | 67,308 |
| | 75,479 |
| | 134,171 |
| | 157,037 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES | | 27,806 |
| | 29,972 |
| | 53,490 |
| | 62,531 |
|
NET INCOME | | $ | 39,502 |
| | $ | 45,507 |
| | $ | 80,681 |
| | $ | 94,506 |
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE (Note 12): | | | | | | | | |
|
Basic | | $ | 0.36 |
| | $ | 0.41 |
| | $ | 0.73 |
| | $ | 0.86 |
|
Diluted | | $ | 0.35 |
| | $ | 0.40 |
| | $ | 0.72 |
| | $ | 0.82 |
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
NET INCOME | | $ | 39,502 |
| | $ | 45,507 |
| | $ | 80,681 |
| | $ | 94,506 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: | | | | | | | | |
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax expense of $273 and $879 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, and $527 and $1,700 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively | | 441 |
| | 1,420 |
| | 850 |
| | 2,745 |
|
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax | | 441 |
| | 1,420 |
| | 850 |
| | 2,745 |
|
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME | | $ | 39,943 |
| | $ | 46,927 |
| | $ | 81,531 |
| | $ | 97,251 |
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except par value)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
ASSETS |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 481,056 |
| | $ | 720,772 |
|
Cash and securities segregated under federal and other regulations | | 321,937 |
| | 382,905 |
|
Receivables from: | | |
| | |
|
Clients, net of allowance of $575 at June 30, 2012 and $716 at December 31, 2011 | | 293,028 |
| | 301,292 |
|
Product sponsors, broker-dealers and clearing organizations | | 131,649 |
| | 143,493 |
|
Others, net of allowance of $8,373 at June 30, 2012 and $8,833 at December 31, 2011 | | 200,382 |
| | 187,408 |
|
Securities owned: | | |
| | |
|
Trading — at fair value | | 6,857 |
| | 6,290 |
|
Held-to-maturity | | 10,154 |
| | 11,167 |
|
Securities borrowed | | 10,128 |
| | 7,890 |
|
Income taxes receivable | | 6,906 |
| | — |
|
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $319,342 at June 30, 2012 and $305,143 at December 31, 2011 | | 109,171 |
| | 91,317 |
|
Debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization of $2,661 at June 30, 2012 and $19,197 at December 31, 2011 | | 23,497 |
| | 18,620 |
|
Goodwill | | 1,362,153 |
| | 1,334,086 |
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $217,919 at June 30, 2012 and $198,139 at December 31, 2011 | | 523,290 |
| | 537,670 |
|
Other assets | | 119,203 |
| | 73,416 |
|
Total assets | | $ | 3,599,411 |
| | $ | 3,816,326 |
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
LIABILITIES: |
Drafts payable | | $ | 149,930 |
| | $ | 187,575 |
|
Payables to clients | | 404,860 |
| | 456,719 |
|
Payables to broker-dealers and clearing organizations | | 35,653 |
| | 34,755 |
|
Accrued commissions and advisory fees payable | | 97,968 |
| | 109,715 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | 169,461 |
| | 161,937 |
|
Income taxes payable | | — |
| | 906 |
|
Unearned revenue | | 58,778 |
| | 59,537 |
|
Senior secured credit facilities | | 1,339,275 |
| | 1,332,668 |
|
Deferred income taxes — net | | 124,083 |
| | 127,766 |
|
Total liabilities | | 2,380,008 |
| | 2,471,578 |
|
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY: | | |
| | |
|
Common stock, $.001 par value; 600,000,000 shares authorized; 115,329,081 shares issued at June 30, 2012 and 110,531,939 shares issued at December 31, 2011 | | 115 |
| | 110 |
|
Additional paid-in capital | | 1,209,293 |
| | 1,137,723 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost — 4,322,512 shares at June 30, 2012 and 2,617,629 shares at December 31, 2011 | | (144,931 | ) | | (89,037 | ) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | | — |
| | (850 | ) |
Retained earnings | | 154,926 |
| | 296,802 |
|
Total stockholders’ equity | | 1,219,403 |
| | 1,344,748 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | | $ | 3,599,411 |
| | $ | 3,816,326 |
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(Unaudited)
(Amounts in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | | | | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Retained Earnings | | Total Stockholders' Equity |
| Common Stock | | | Treasury Stock | | | |
| Shares | | Amount | | | Shares | | Amount | | | |
BALANCE — December 31, 2010 | 108,715 |
| | $ | 109 |
| | $ | 1,051,722 |
| | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (4,496 | ) | | $ | 126,420 |
| | $ | 1,173,755 |
|
Net income and other comprehensive income, net of tax expense | |
| | |
| | |
| | | | | | 2,745 |
| | 94,506 |
| | 97,251 |
|
Treasury stock purchases | | | | | | | 2,284 |
| | (79,568 | ) | | | | | | (79,568 | ) |
Stock option exercises and other | 1,410 |
| | 1 |
| | 6,971 |
| | | | | | | | | | 6,972 |
|
Share-based compensation | | | | | 9,199 |
| | | | | | | | | | 9,199 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation | | | | | 55,847 |
| | | | | | | | | | 55,847 |
|
BALANCE — June 30, 2011 | 110,125 |
| | $ | 110 |
| | $ | 1,123,739 |
| | 2,284 |
| | $ | (79,568 | ) | | $ | (1,751 | ) | | $ | 220,926 |
| | $ | 1,263,456 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE — December 31, 2011 | 110,532 |
| | $ | 110 |
| | $ | 1,137,723 |
| | 2,618 |
| | $ | (89,037 | ) | | $ | (850 | ) | | $ | 296,802 |
| | $ | 1,344,748 |
|
Net income and other comprehensive income, net of tax expense | | | | | | | | | | | 850 |
| | 80,681 |
| | 81,531 |
|
Issuance of common stock to settle restricted stock units (Note 11) | 2,823 |
| | 3 |
| | (3 | ) | | | | | | | | | | — |
|
Treasury stock purchases (Note 11) | | | | | | | 1,705 |
| | (55,894 | ) | | | | | | (55,894 | ) |
Cash dividends on common stock | | | | | | | | | | | | | (222,557 | ) | | (222,557 | ) |
Stock option exercises and other | 1,952 |
| | 2 |
| | 11,097 |
| | | | | | | | | | 11,099 |
|
Share-based compensation | 22 |
| | | | 12,072 |
| | | | | | | | | | 12,072 |
|
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation | | | | | 48,404 |
| | | | | | | | | | 48,404 |
|
BALANCE — June 30, 2012 | 115,329 |
| | $ | 115 |
| | $ | 1,209,293 |
| | 4,323 |
| | $ | (144,931 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 154,926 |
| | $ | 1,219,403 |
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | |
Net income | | $ | 80,681 |
| | $ | 94,506 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | |
Noncash items: | | | | |
Depreciation and amortization | | 34,587 |
| | 36,572 |
|
Amortization of debt issuance costs | | 2,349 |
| | 2,546 |
|
Share-based compensation | | 12,072 |
| | 9,199 |
|
Excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation | | (48,404 | ) | | (55,847 | ) |
Provision for bad debts | | 488 |
| | 799 |
|
Deferred income tax provision | | (6,241 | ) | | (5,952 | ) |
Impairment of intangible assets | | — |
| | 1,716 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt | | 16,524 |
| | — |
|
Loan forgiveness | | 751 |
| | 756 |
|
Other | | 768 |
| | 659 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | |
Cash and securities segregated under federal and other regulations | | 60,968 |
| | 147,746 |
|
Receivables from clients | | 8,405 |
| | (17,135 | ) |
Receivables from product sponsors, broker-dealers and clearing organizations | | 11,844 |
| | 42,987 |
|
Receivables from others | | (10,806 | ) | | (18,675 | ) |
Securities owned | | (574 | ) | | (231 | ) |
Securities borrowed | | (2,238 | ) | | (3,159 | ) |
Other assets | | (41,215 | ) | | (17,397 | ) |
Drafts payable | | (37,645 | ) | | (44,702 | ) |
Payables to clients | | (51,859 | ) | | 31,519 |
|
Payables to broker-dealers and clearing organizations | | 898 |
| | (1,931 | ) |
Accrued commissions and advisory fees payable | | (11,747 | ) | | (19,072 | ) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | (3,326 | ) | | (27,476 | ) |
Income taxes receivable/payable | | 40,592 |
| | 181,828 |
|
Unearned revenue | | (759 | ) | | 10,460 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities | | $ | 56,113 |
| | $ | 349,716 |
|
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - (Continued)
(Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 |
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: | | | | |
Capital expenditures | | $ | (18,793 | ) | | $ | (12,500 | ) |
Purchase of securities classified as held-to-maturity | | (2,015 | ) | | (3,782 | ) |
Proceeds from maturity of securities classified as held-to-maturity | | 3,000 |
| | 1,650 |
|
Deposits of restricted cash | | (9,964 | ) | | (3,040 | ) |
Release of restricted cash | | 6,800 |
| | 18,546 |
|
Acquisitions (Note 3) | | (38,766 | ) | | (37,184 | ) |
Net cash used in investing activities | | (59,738 | ) | | (36,310 | ) |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | |
Repayment of senior secured credit facilities | | (1,343,393 | ) | | (46,986 | ) |
Proceeds from senior secured credit facilities | | 1,330,681 |
| | — |
|
Payment of debt issuance costs | | (4,431 | ) | | — |
|
Repurchase of common stock | | (55,894 | ) | | (66,976 | ) |
Dividends on common stock | | (222,557 | ) | | — |
|
Excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation | | 48,404 |
| | 55,847 |
|
Proceeds from stock options and warrants exercised | | 11,099 |
| | 6,972 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities | | (236,091 | ) | | (51,143 | ) |
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | | (239,716 | ) | | 262,263 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — Beginning of period | | 720,772 |
| | 419,208 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — End of period | | $ | 481,056 |
| | $ | 681,471 |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | | | | |
Interest paid | | $ | 29,570 |
| | $ | 36,362 |
|
Income taxes paid | | $ | 17,765 |
| | $ | 29,870 |
|
NONCASH DISCLOSURES: | | | | |
Capital expenditures purchased through short-term credit | | $ | 1,994 |
| | $ | 3,506 |
|
Fixed assets acquired under build-to-suit lease | | $ | 5,599 |
| | $ | — |
|
Unrealized gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax expense | | $ | 850 |
| | $ | 2,745 |
|
Discount on proceeds from senior secured credit facilities recorded as debt issuance costs | | $ | 19,319 |
| | $ | — |
|
Pending settlement of treasury stock purchases | | $ | — |
| | $ | 12,592 |
|
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
1. Organization and Description of the Company
LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (“LPLFH”), formerly known as LPL Investment Holdings Inc., a Delaware holding corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) provides an integrated platform of brokerage and investment advisory services to independent financial advisors and financial advisors at financial institutions (collectively “advisors”) in the United States of America. Through its custody and clearing platform, the Company provides access to diversified financial products and services enabling its advisors to offer independent financial advice and brokerage services, using integrated technology, to retail investors (their “clients”).
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation — Quarterly Reporting — The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. These adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The Company’s results for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year or any other interim period. Certain reclassifications were made to previously reported amounts in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto to make them consistent with the current period presentation.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all information and notes necessary for a complete presentation of financial position, results of income, comprehensive income and cash flows in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Accordingly, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes for the year ended December 31, 2011, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC. The Company has evaluated subsequent events up to and including the date these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were issued.
Consolidation — These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of LPLFH and its subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. Equity investments in which the Company exercises significant influence but does not exercise control and is not the primary beneficiary are accounted for using the equity method.
Comprehensive Income — In accordance with Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income — Presentation of Comprehensive Income, adopted in the first quarter of 2012, the Company presents its unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income separately and immediately following its unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. The Company’s comprehensive income is composed of net income and the effective portion of the unrealized gains on financial derivatives in cash flow hedge relationships, net of related tax effects.
Use of Estimates — The preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates estimates, including those related to revenue and related expense recognition, asset impairment, valuation of accounts receivable, valuation of financial derivatives, contingencies and litigation, valuation and recognition of share-based payments, dividends and income taxes. These accounting policies are stated in the notes to the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC. These estimates are based on the information that is currently available and on various other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could vary from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions and the differences may be material to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Reportable Segment — The Company’s internal reporting is organized into three service channels; Independent Advisor Services, Institution Services and Custom Clearing Services, which are designed to enhance the services provided to its advisors and financial institutions. These service channels qualify as individual operating segments, but are aggregated and viewed as one single reportable segment due to their similar economic
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
characteristics, products and services, production and distribution process, regulatory environment and quantitative thresholds.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments — The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are carried at fair value or at amounts that, because of their short-term nature, approximate current fair value, with the exception of its indebtedness. The Company carries its indebtedness at amortized cost. The Company measures the implied fair value of its debt instruments using trading levels obtained from a third-party service provider. Accordingly, the debt instruments qualify as Level 2 fair value measurements. See Note 5 for additional detail regarding the Company’s fair value measurements. As of June 30, 2012, the carrying amount and fair value of the Company’s indebtedness was approximately $1,339.3 million and $1,306.8 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, the carrying amount and fair value was approximately $1,332.7 million and $1,328.2 million, respectively.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements — There were no recently issued accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements as compared to the recent accounting pronouncements described in the Company’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, that are of significance, or potential significance to the Company.
3. Acquisitions
The Company completed several acquisitions in 2011 and 2012, including National Retirement Partners, Inc. ("NRP"), Concord Capital Partners ("Concord") and Fortigent Holdings Company, Inc. The pro forma results of operations and the results of operations for acquisitions since the acquisition dates have not been separately disclosed because the effects were not significant enough to the consolidated financial statements, individually or in the aggregate. See Note 3 in the 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion of the NRP and Concord acquisitions.
Each of the purchase prices for NRP and Concord included initial cash payments, as well as future payment considerations. In accordance with the acquisition agreements, the former owners have the right to receive certain future payments contingent upon reaching certain revenue-based and gross margin-based milestones. These contingent consideration liabilities are measured at fair value on a quarterly basis based on progress towards the defined milestones (see Note 5).
Fortigent Holdings Company, Inc.
On April 23, 2012, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Fortigent Holdings Company, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries Fortigent, LLC, Fortigent Reporting Company, LLC, and Fortigent Strategies Company, LLC (together, "Fortigent"). Fortigent is a leading provider of high net worth solutions and consulting services to registered investment advisors, banks, and trust companies. This strategic acquisition further enhances the Company's capabilities and offers an extension of the Company's existing services for wealth management advisors.
The Company paid $38.8 million at the closing of the transaction, net of cash acquired. As of June 30, 2012, $9.9 million remains in an escrow account to be paid to former shareholders of Fortigent in accordance with the terms of the stock purchase agreement. Such amount has been classified by the Company as restricted cash and is included in other assets on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. Goodwill resulting from this business combination is largely attributable to the existing workforce of Fortigent and synergies expected to arise after the Company's acquisition of Fortigent. The Company cumulatively incurred transaction costs associated with its acquisition of Fortigent totaling $1.2 million; $0.7 million of which were recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2012, and are included in other expenses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income.
The Company is in the process of finalizing the purchase allocation; therefore, the provisional measures of goodwill, intangibles and fixed assets are subject to change.
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Set forth below is a reconciliation of assets acquired and liabilities assumed during the six months ended June 30, 2012 (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| Total |
Goodwill | $ | 28,067 |
|
Accounts receivable | 3,548 |
|
Other assets | 2,310 |
|
Intangibles | 5,400 |
|
Fixed assets(1) | 6,275 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (6,834 | ) |
Net assets acquired | $ | 38,766 |
|
________________________________
| |
(1) | Fixed assets acquired from Fortigent relate primarily to internally developed software, which is being amortized over 5 years. |
Set forth below is supplemental cash flow information in connection with the Fortigent acquisition for the six months ended June 30, 2012 (in thousands):
|
| | | |
Cash payments, net of cash acquired | $ | 28,866 |
|
Cash held in escrow | 9,900 |
|
Total purchase price | $ | 38,766 |
|
The Company preliminarily allocated the estimated purchase price for intangibles to specific amortizable intangible asset categories as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | |
| Weighted Average Amortization Period (in years) | | Amount Assigned |
Client relationships | 9.4 | | $ | 4,200 |
|
Trade names | 10.0 | | 1,200 |
|
Total intangible assets acquired from Fortigent | | | $ | 5,400 |
|
4. Restructuring
Consolidation of UVEST Financial Services Group, Inc.
On March 14, 2011, the Company committed to a corporate restructuring plan to consolidate the operations of UVEST Financial Services Group, Inc. ("UVEST") with LPL Financial LLC ("LPL Financial"). The restructuring plan was effected to enhance the Company’s service offering, while also generating efficiencies. In connection with the consolidation, certain registered representatives associated with UVEST moved to LPL Financial through a transfer of their licenses. The Company completed the transfers in December 2011. Following the transfer of registered representatives and client accounts to LPL Financial, all registered representatives and client accounts are associated with LPL Financial and all of the Company’s securities business is done through a single broker-dealer. UVEST has withdrawn its registration with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") effective July 16, 2012 and is no longer subject to net capital filing requirements.
The Company estimates total expenditures associated with the initiative to be approximately $31.6 million over the course of the restructuring plan. These expenditures are comprised of advisor retention and related benefits, contract penalties, technology costs, non-cash charges for the impairment of intangible assets resulting from advisor attrition and other expenses principally relating to the conversion and transfer of registered representatives and client accounts from UVEST to LPL Financial.
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the balance of accrued expenses and the changes in the accrued amounts as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2012 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accrued Balance at December 31, 2011 |
| | Costs Incurred | | Payments | | Non-cash | | Accrued Balance at June 30, 2012 | | Cumulative Costs Incurred to Date | | Total Expected Restructuring Costs(1) |
Conversion and transfer costs | $ | 1,076 |
| | $ | 2,676 |
| | $ | (3,736 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 16 |
| | $ | 11,854 |
| | $ | 14,690 |
|
Contract penalties | 8,832 |
| | — |
| | (8,271 | ) | | — |
| | 561 |
| | 8,642 |
| | 8,642 |
|
Advisor retention and related benefits | 250 |
| | 649 |
| | (192 | ) | | (457 | ) | | 250 |
| | 1,438 |
| | 5,513 |
|
Asset impairments | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2,776 |
| | 2,776 |
|
Total | $ | 10,158 |
| | $ | 3,325 |
| | $ | (12,199 | ) | | $ | (457 | ) | | $ | 827 |
| | $ | 24,710 |
| | $ | 31,621 |
|
________________________________
| |
(1) | At June 30, 2012, total expected restructuring costs exclude approximately $12.0 million of internally developed software related to the corporate restructuring initiative that is being capitalized over a useful life ranging from three to five years, with expense being recorded as depreciation and amortization within the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. As of June 30, 2012, approximately $13.5 million has been spent on development activities of which approximately $10.7 million has been capitalized, with the remainder included in costs incurred. The Company anticipates capitalizing an additional $1.3 million of internally developed software in the remainder of 2012. |
5. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Inputs used to measure fair value are prioritized within a three-level fair value hierarchy. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
| |
• | Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
| |
• | Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. |
| |
• | Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs. |
There have been no transfers of assets or liabilities between fair value measurement classifications during the six months ended June 30, 2012.
The Company’s fair value measurements are evaluated within the fair value hierarchy, based on the nature of inputs used to determine the fair value at the measurement date. At June 30, 2012, the Company had the following financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:
Cash Equivalents — The Company’s cash equivalents include money market funds, which are short term in nature with readily determinable values derived from active markets.
Securities Owned and Securities Sold, But Not Yet Purchased — The Company’s trading securities consist of house account model portfolios for the purpose of benchmarking the performance of its fee based advisory platforms and temporary positions resulting from the processing of client transactions. Examples of these securities include money market funds, U.S. treasuries, mutual funds, certificates of deposit, traded equity securities and debt securities.
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The Company uses prices obtained from independent third-party pricing services to measure the fair value of its trading securities. Prices received from the pricing services are validated using various methods including comparison to prices received from additional pricing services, comparison to available quoted market prices and review of other relevant market data including implied yields of major categories of securities. In general, these quoted prices are derived from active markets for identical assets or liabilities. When quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities are not available, the quoted prices are based on similar assets and liabilities or inputs other than the quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly. For certificates of deposit and treasury securities, the Company utilizes market-based inputs including observable market interest rates that correspond to the remaining maturities or the next interest reset dates. At June 30, 2012, the Company did not adjust prices received from the independent third-party pricing services. Securities sold, but not yet purchased are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial position.
Other Assets — The Company’s other assets include deferred compensation plan assets that are invested in money market funds and mutual funds which are actively traded and valued based on quoted market prices in active markets.
Contingent Consideration Liabilities — The contingent consideration liabilities, which are included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial position, result from the Company's acquisitions of NRP and Concord.
Interest Rate Swap — The Company’s interest rate swap, which matured on June 30, 2012, was not traded on a market exchange; therefore, the fair value was determined using models which included assumptions about the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) yield curve at interim reporting dates as well as counterparty credit risk and the Company’s own non-performance risk. Accordingly, the Company has classified the interest rate swap as a Level 2 measurement within the fair value hierarchy. At December 31, 2011, the interest rate swap is included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial position.
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2012 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Fair Value Measurements |
At June 30, 2012: | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | |
Cash equivalents | $ | 298,152 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 298,152 |
|
Securities owned — trading: | | | | | | | |
Money market funds | 493 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 493 |
|
Mutual funds | 5,284 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,284 |
|
Equity securities | 46 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 46 |
|
Debt securities | — |
| | 134 |
| | — |
| | 134 |
|
U.S. treasury obligations | 900 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 900 |
|
Total securities owned — trading | 6,723 |
| | 134 |
| | — |
| | 6,857 |
|
Other assets | 26,657 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 26,657 |
|
Total assets at fair value | $ | 331,532 |
| | $ | 134 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 331,666 |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | |
Securities sold, but not yet purchased: | | | | | | | |
Equity securities | $ | 263 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 263 |
|
Debt securities | — |
| | 126 |
| | — |
| | 126 |
|
Certificates of deposit | — |
| | 25 |
| | — |
| | 25 |
|
Total securities sold, but not yet purchased | 263 |
| | 151 |
| | — |
| | 414 |
|
Contingent consideration liabilities | — |
| | — |
| | 16,813 |
| | 16,813 |
|
Total liabilities at fair value | $ | 263 |
| | $ | 151 |
| | $ | 16,813 |
| | $ | 17,227 |
|
Changes in Level 3 Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The contingent consideration liabilities, which result from the Company's acquisitions of NRP and Concord, represent future amounts the Company may be required to pay upon the achievement of certain finance milestones. The contingent consideration is recorded at its estimated fair value with any changes in fair value recognized in earnings. The fair value measurement is based on significant inputs unobservable in the market and thus represents a Level 3 measurement.
The fair value of the contingent consideration is determined using financial forecasts, which estimate the probability and timing of certain revenue and gross margin milestones being reached, and discounting the associated cash payments to their present value using a risk-adjusted rate of return. At each reporting date, or whenever there are significant changes in underlying key assumptions, a review of these assumptions is performed and the contingent consideration liability is updated to its estimated fair value. If there are no significant changes in the assumptions, the quarterly determination of the fair value of contingent consideration reflects the accretion of interest for the passage of time. Changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration obligation may result from changes in the terms of the contingent payments, changes in discount periods and rates, and changes in probability assumptions with respect to the timing and likelihood of achieving the certain financial targets. Actual progress toward achieving the financial targets for the remaining measurement periods may be different than the Company's expectations of future performance. Failure to meet current expectations of progress may reduce the probability of achieving the targets and may result in a reduction of the fair value of the contingent consideration liability.
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Set forth below is a reconciliation of the contingent consideration for the six months ended June 30, 2012 (in thousands):
|
| | | |
Fair value at December 31, 2011 | $ | 16,104 |
|
Change in estimated fair value of contingent consideration liabilities | 709 |
|
Fair value at June 30, 2012 | $ | 16,813 |
|
The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Fair Value Measurements |
At December 31, 2011: | | | | | | | |
Assets | | | | | | | |
Cash equivalents | $ | 575,243 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 575,243 |
|
Securities owned — trading: | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Money market funds | 262 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 262 |
|
Mutual funds | 4,966 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,966 |
|
Equity securities | 47 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 47 |
|
Debt securities | — |
| | 115 |
| | — |
| | 115 |
|
Certificates of deposit | 900 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 900 |
|
Total securities owned — trading | 6,175 |
| | 115 |
| | — |
| | 6,290 |
|
Other assets | 21,400 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21,400 |
|
Total assets at fair value | $ | 602,818 |
| | $ | 115 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 602,933 |
|
Liabilities | | | | | | | |
Securities sold, but not yet purchased: | | | | | | | |
Equity securities | $ | 134 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 134 |
|
Debt securities | — |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | 2 |
|
Certificates of deposit | — |
| | 25 |
| | — |
| | 25 |
|
Total securities sold, but not yet purchased | 134 |
| | 27 |
| | — |
| | 161 |
|
Contingent consideration liabilities | — |
| | — |
| | 16,104 |
| | 16,104 |
|
Interest rate swap | — |
| | 1,377 |
| | — |
| | 1,377 |
|
Total liabilities at fair value | $ | 134 |
| | $ | 1,404 |
| | $ | 16,104 |
| | $ | 17,642 |
|
6. Held-to-Maturity Securities
The Company holds certain investments in securities including U.S. government notes, which are recorded at amortized cost because the Company has both the intent and the ability to hold these investments to maturity. Interest income is accrued as earned. Premiums and discounts are amortized using a method that approximates the effective yield method over the term of the security and are recorded as an adjustment to the investment yield. The Company discloses the fair value of its securities held-to-maturity using quoted prices in active markets, which is a Level 1 fair value measurement.
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and fair value of securities held-to-maturity were as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized (Losses)/Gains | | Fair Value |
At June 30, 2012: | | | | | |
U.S. government notes | $ | 10,154 |
| | $ | (1 | ) | | $ | 10,153 |
|
| | | | | |
At December 31, 2011: | | | | | |
U.S. government notes | $ | 11,167 |
| | $ | 27 |
| | $ | 11,194 |
|
At June 30, 2012, the held-to-maturity securities were scheduled to mature as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Within 1 Year | | 1-3 Years | | Total |
U.S. government notes — at amortized cost | $ | 9,148 |
| — |
| $ | 1,006 |
| | $ | 10,154 |
|
U.S. government notes — at fair value | $ | 9,147 |
| | $ | 1,006 |
| | $ | 10,153 |
|
7. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
A summary of the activity in goodwill is presented below (in thousands):
|
| | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2011 | $ | 1,334,086 |
| |
Acquisition of Fortigent (Note 3) | 28,067 |
| (1 | ) |
Balance at June 30, 2012 | $ | 1,362,153 |
| |
________________________________
| |
(1) | This is a provisional amount and is subject to change (see Note 3). |
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The components of intangible assets as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows (dollars in thousands): |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted Average Life Remaining (in years) | | Gross Carrying Value | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Value |
At June 30, 2012: | | | | | | | |
Definite-lived intangible assets: | | | | | | | |
Advisor and financial institution relationships | 13.3 | | $ | 450,164 |
| | $ | (145,079 | ) | | $ | 305,085 |
|
Product sponsor relationships | 13.5 | | 230,916 |
| | (69,970 | ) | | 160,946 |
|
Client relationships | 11.6 | | 19,110 |
| | (2,850 | ) | | 16,260 |
|
Trade names | 9.8 | | 1,200 |
| | (20 | ) | | 1,180 |
|
Total definite-lived intangible assets | | | $ | 701,390 |
| | $ | (217,919 | ) | | $ | 483,471 |
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets: | | | | | | | |
Trademark and trade name | | | | | | | 39,819 |
|
Total intangible assets | | | | | | | $ | 523,290 |
|
| | | | | | | |
At December 31, 2011: | | | | | | | |
Definite-lived intangible assets: | | | | | | | |
Advisor and financial institution relationships | 13.7 | | $ | 450,164 |
| | $ | (132,503 | ) | | $ | 317,661 |
|
Product sponsor relationships | 14.0 | | 230,916 |
| | (63,710 | ) | | 167,206 |
|
Client relationships | 12.9 | | 14,910 |
| | (1,926 | ) | | 12,984 |
|
Total definite-lived intangible assets | | | $ | 695,990 |
| | $ | (198,139 | ) | | $ | 497,851 |
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets: | | | | | | | |
Trademark and trade name | | | | | | | 39,819 |
|
Total intangible assets | | | | | | | $ | 537,670 |
|
Total amortization expense of intangible assets was $10.0 million and $9.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $19.8 million and $19.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Amortization expense for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2012 through 2016 and thereafter is estimated as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
2012 - remainder | $ | 19,762 |
|
2013 | 39,006 |
|
2014 | 38,680 |
|
2015 | 37,774 |
|
2016 | 37,619 |
|
Thereafter | 310,630 |
|
Total | $ | 483,471 |
|
8. Income Taxes
The Company’s effective income tax rate differs from the federal corporate tax rate of 35.0%, primarily as a result of state taxes, settlement contingencies and expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes. These items resulted in effective tax rates of 41.3% and 39.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and 39.9% and 39.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
9. Indebtedness
Senior Secured Credit Facilities — On March 29, 2012, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with its wholly owned subsidiary, LPL Holdings, Inc., the other Credit Parties signatory thereto, the Several Lenders signatory thereto, and Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent, Letter of Credit Issuer, and Swingline Lender. The Credit Agreement refinanced and replaced the Company’s Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2010 (the "Original Credit Agreement").
Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the Company established a Term Loan A of $735.0 million maturing on March 29, 2017 (the "Term Loan A"), a Term Loan B of $615.0 million maturing on March 29, 2019 (the "Term Loan B") and a revolving credit facility with borrowing capacity of $250.0 million maturing on March 29, 2017 (the "Revolving Credit Facility"). In connection with the Credit Agreement, the Company incurred $23.7 million in costs that are capitalized as debt issuance costs in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.
The Revolving Credit Facility was undrawn at closing. The Revolving Credit Facility is currently being used to support the issuance of $31.3 million of irrevocable letters of credit for the construction of the Company's future San Diego office building, the Company's subsidiary The Private Trust Company N.A. ("PTC") and other items.
Quarterly repayments of the principal for Term Loan A will total 5.0% per year for years one and two, and 10.0% per year for years three, four, and five, with the remaining principal due upon maturity. Quarterly repayments of the principal for Term Loan B will total 1.0% per year with the remaining principal due upon maturity. Any outstanding principal under the Revolving Credit Facility will be due upon maturity.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a base rate equal to either one, two, three, six, nine or twelve-month LIBOR (the "Eurodollar Rate") plus the applicable margin, or an alternative base rate (“ABR”) plus the applicable margin. The ABR is equal to the greatest of (a) the prime rate in effect on such day, (b) the effective federal funds rate in effect on such day plus 0.50%, (c) the Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00% and (d) solely in the case of Term Loan B, 2.00%. The Credit Agreement subjects the Company to certain financial and non-financial covenants. As of June 30, 2012, the Company was in compliance with such covenants. The Company may voluntarily repay outstanding loans under its Credit Agreement at any time without premium or penalty, other than customary breakage costs with respect to LIBOR loans and with the exception of certain repricing transactions in respect of the Term Loan B consummated before March 29, 2013, which will be subject to a premium of 1.0% of the principal amount of Term Loan B subject to such repricing transaction.
The applicable margin for borrowings with respect to the (a) Term Loan A is currently 1.50% for base rate borrowings and 2.50% for LIBOR borrowings; and (b) Term Loan B is currently 2.00% for base rate borrowings and 3.00% for LIBOR borrowings. The LIBOR Rate with respect to the Term Loan B shall in no event be less than 1.00%. The applicable margin for borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility is currently 1.50% for base rate borrowings and 2.50% for LIBOR borrowings with a commitment fee of 0.50%. Except for the letters of credit described above, there were no outstanding balances on the Revolving Credit Facility at June 30, 2012.
On March 29, 2012, the Company used proceeds from borrowings under the Credit Agreement to repay all outstanding principal borrowings under the Original Credit Agreement. Accordingly, in the first quarter of 2012, the Company accelerated the recognition of $16.5 million of debt issuance costs related to borrowings under the Original Credit Agreement, which has been recorded as loss on extinguishment of debt within the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. Prior to the repayment, the Original Credit Agreement consisted of three term loan tranches: a $302.5 million term loan facility with a maturity of June 18, 2013 (the "2013 Term Loans"), a $476.9 million term loan facility with a maturity of June 25, 2015 (the "2015 Term Loans") and a $553.2 million term loan facility with a maturity of June 28, 2017 (the "2017 Term Loans"). The Original Credit Agreement also subjected the Company to certain financial and non-financial covenants. As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all such covenants.
The Original Credit Agreement included a revolving credit facility of $163.5 million, which had a maturity date of June 28, 2013, with a commitment fee of 0.75%. Borrowings were priced at LIBOR + 3.50%. Such facility had no outstanding balance at December 31, 2011 and has been replaced by the Revolving Credit Facility.
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
The applicable margin for borrowings under the Original Credit Agreement with respect to the (a) 2013 Term Loans was 0.75% for base rate borrowings and 1.75% for LIBOR borrowings, (b) 2015 Term Loans was 1.75% for base rate borrowings and 2.75% for LIBOR borrowings, and (c) 2017 Term Loans was 2.75% for base rate borrowings and 3.75% for LIBOR borrowings. The LIBOR Rate with respect to the 2015 Term Loans and the 2017 Term Loans had a floor of 1.50%.
Bank Loans Payable — The Company maintains three uncommitted lines of credit. Two of the lines have an unspecified limit, and are primarily dependent on the Company’s ability to provide sufficient collateral. The other line has a $150.0 million limit and allows for both collateralized and uncollateralized borrowings. Certain lines were utilized in 2012 and 2011; however, there were no balances outstanding at June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.
The Company’s outstanding borrowings were as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | June 30, 2012 | | | December 31, 2011 | |
| Maturity | | Balance | | Interest Rate | | | Balance | | Interest Rate | |
Senior secured term loans: | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hedged with an interest rate swap(1) | 6/28/2013 | | $ | — |
| |
| | | $ | 65,000 |
| | 2.33 | % | (4) |
Unhedged: | | | | | | | | | | | |
2013 Term Loans | 6/28/2013 | | — |
| |
| | | 237,489 |
| | 2.05 | % | (5) |
2015 Term Loans | 6/25/2015 | | — |
| |
| | | 476,935 |
| | 4.25 | % | (6) |
2017 Term Loans | 6/28/2017 | | — |
| |
| | | 553,244 |
| | 5.25 | % | (7) |
Term Loan A | 3/29/2017 | | 725,813 |
| | 2.75 | % | (2) | | — |
| | | |
Term Loan B | 3/29/2019 | | 613,462 |
| | 4.00 | % | (3) | | — |
| | | |
Total borrowings | | | 1,339,275 |
| | | | | 1,332,668 |
| | | |
Less current borrowings (maturities within 12 months) | | | 42,900 |
| | | | | 13,971 |
| | | |
Long-term borrowings — net of current portion | | | $ | 1,296,375 |
| | | | | $ | 1,318,697 |
| | | |
____________
| |
(1) | The Company had an interest rate swap with a notional balance of $65.0 million, that matured on June 30, 2012. |
| |
(2) | As of June 30, 2012, the variable interest rate for Term Loan A is based on the one-month LIBOR of 0.25%, plus the applicable interest rate margin of 2.50%. |
| |
(3) | As of June 30, 2012, the variable interest rate for Term Loan B is based on the greater of the one-month LIBOR of 0.25% or 1.00%, plus the applicable interest rate margin of 3.00%. |
| |
(4) | As of December 31, 2011, the variable interest rate for the hedged portion of the 2013 Term Loans is based on the three-month LIBOR of 0.58%, plus the applicable interest rate margin of 1.75%. |
| |
(5) | As of December 31, 2011, the variable interest rate for the unhedged portion of the 2013 Term Loans is based on the one-month LIBOR of 0.30%, plus the applicable interest rate margin of 1.75%. |
| |
(6) | As of December 31, 2011, the variable interest rate for the unhedged portion of the 2015 Term Loans is based on the greater of the one-month LIBOR of 0.30% or 1.50%, plus the applicable interest rate margin of 2.75%. |
| |
(7) | As of December 31, 2011, the variable interest rate for the unhedged portion of the 2017 Term Loans is based on the greater of the one-month LIBOR of 0.30% or 1.50%, plus the applicable interest rate margin of 3.75%. |
The combined average balance outstanding in the revolving and uncommitted line of credit facilities was approximately $0.3 million and six thousand dollars for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $0.2 million and six thousand dollars for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011,
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
respectively. The weighted-average interest rate was 1.70% and 0.82% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and 1.56% and 1.16% for the six months ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
The minimum calendar year payments and maturities of the senior secured borrowings as of June 30, 2012 are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
2012 — remainder | $ | 21,450 |
|
2013 | 42,900 |
|
2014 | 70,463 |
|
2015 | 79,650 |
|
2016 | 79,650 |
|
Thereafter | 1,045,162 |
|
Total | $ | 1,339,275 |
|
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases — The Company leases certain office space and equipment under various operating leases. These leases are generally subject to scheduled base rent and maintenance cost increases, which are recognized on a straight-line basis over the period of the leases.
Service Contracts — The Company is party to certain long-term contracts for systems and services that enable back office trade processing and clearing for its product and service offerings.
Future minimum payments under leases, lease commitments and other noncancellable contractual obligations with remaining terms greater than one year as of June 30, 2012, are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
2012 - remainder | $ | 12,875 |
|
2013 | 27,984 |
|
2014 | 28,358 |
|
2015 | 27,355 |
|
2016 | 27,203 |
|
Thereafter | 264,729 |
|
Total(1) | $ | 388,504 |
|
____________
| |
(1) | Minimum payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rental income of $5.4 million due in the future under noncancellable subleases. |
Included in the schedule of future minimum payments above is a fifteen-year lease commitment that was executed in December 2011 for the Company's future San Diego office building with a lease commencement date of May 1, 2014. Future minimum payments for this lease commitment are $9.6 million, $14.8 million, $15.4 million and $236.8 million for the years 2014, 2015, 2016 and thereafter, respectively.
Total rental expense for all operating leases was approximately $4.8 million and $4.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $9.1 million and $8.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, respectively.
Guarantees — The Company occasionally enters into certain types of contracts that contingently require it to indemnify certain parties against third-party claims. The terms of these obligations vary and, because a maximum obligation is not explicitly stated, the Company has determined that it is not possible to make an estimate of the amount that it could be obligated to pay under such contracts.
The Company’s subsidiary, LPL Financial, provides guarantees to securities clearing houses and exchanges under their standard membership agreements, which require a member to guarantee the performance of other members. Under these agreements, if a member becomes unable to satisfy its obligations to the clearing houses and exchanges, all other members would be required to meet any shortfall. The Company’s liability under these
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
arrangements is not quantifiable and may exceed the cash and securities it has posted as collateral. However, the potential requirement for the Company to make payments under these agreements is remote. Accordingly, no liability has been recognized for these transactions.
Loan Commitments — From time to time, LPL Financial makes loans to its advisors which may be forgivable, primarily to newly signed advisors to assist in the transition process. Due to timing differences, LPL Financial may make commitments to issue such loans prior to actually funding them. These commitments are generally contingent upon certain events occurring, including but not limited to the advisor joining LPL Financial. LPL Financial had no significant unfunded commitments at June 30, 2012.
Litigation — The Company has been named as a defendant in various legal actions, substantially all of which are arbitrations. In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of such matters, particularly in cases in which claimants seek substantial or indeterminate damages, the Company cannot predict with certainty what the eventual loss or range of loss related to such matters will be. The Company recognizes a legal liability when it believes it is probable a liability has occurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. If some amount within a range of loss appears at the time to be a better estimate than any other amount within the range, the Company accrues that amount. When no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, however, the Company accrues the minimum amount in the range.
The Company records legal reserves and related insurance recoveries for significant or unusual cases on a gross basis.
The Company is subject to and maintains insurance coverage for claims and lawsuits in the ordinary course of business, such as customer complaints or disclosures about risks with securities purchased, as well as various arbitrations and other litigation matters. With respect to these matters, the estimated losses on the majority of pending matters are less than the applicable deductibles of the insurance policies, and matters with estimated losses in excess of the applicable deductibles are not, in the aggregate, material.
Defense costs are expensed as incurred and classified as professional services within the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. When there is indemnification or insurance, the Company may engage in defense of settlement and subsequently seek reimbursement for such matters. In connection with various acquisitions, and pursuant to the purchase and sale agreements, the Company has received third-party indemnification for certain legal proceedings and claims. Some of these matters have been defended and paid directly by the indemnifying party.
The Company believes, based on the information available at this time, after consultation with counsel, consideration of insurance, if any, and indemnifications provided by the third-party indemnitors, that the outcomes of any legal proceedings will not have a material adverse impact on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition, income, comprehensive income or cash flows.
Regulatory — On July 20, 2012, the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) issued a Notice of Proposed Adjustment (the “Notice”) asserting that the Company is subject to a penalty with respect to an alleged untimely deposit of withholding taxes related to wages paid upon exercise of certain non-qualified stock options in connection with the Company's initial public offering in 2010. At this time, the Company is unable to provide a reasonable estimate of the potential range of ultimate liability because: (i) this matter is still in the early stages of discussion, (ii) the Company may dispute one or more legal positions asserted by the IRS and (iii) the defenses available to the Company will be dependent on the facts and circumstances of the transactions at issue. The Company plans to defend its position through applicable IRS and judicial procedures, as appropriate. Although the final resolution of the proposed adjustment is uncertain, the Company believes that the outcome will not be material to its financial position, but any penalty paid in connection with the Notice could have a material effect on the results of operations for the particular period.
Other Commitments — As of June 30, 2012, LPL Financial had received collateral primarily in connection with client margin loans with a market value of approximately $343.5 million, which it can sell or re-pledge. Of this amount, approximately $44.4 million has been pledged or sold as of June 30, 2012; $21.2 million was pledged with client-owned securities to the Options Clearing Corporation ("OCC") as collateral to secure client obligations related
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
to options positions, and $23.2 million was loaned to the National Securities Clearing Corporation ("NSCC") through participation in its Stock Borrow Program. Additionally, approximately $144.3 million are held at banks in connection with unutilized secured margin lines of credit; these securities may be used as collateral for loans from these banks. The remainder of $154.8 million has not been re-pledged or sold, and as of June 30, 2012 there are no restrictions that materially limit the Company's ability to re-pledge or sell the remaining $299.1 million of client collateral.
As of December 31, 2011, LPL Financial had received collateral primarily in connection with client margin loans with a market value of approximately $350.2 million, which it can sell or repledge. Of this amount, approximately $32.7 million has been pledged or sold as of December 31, 2011; $18.4 million was pledged with client-owned securities to the OCC as collateral to secure client obligations related to options positions, and $14.3 million was loaned to the NSCC through participation in its Stock Borrow Program. Additionally, approximately $145.0 million are held at banks in connection with unutilized secured margin lines of credit; these securities may be used as collateral for loans from these banks. The remainder of $172.5 million had not been re-pledged or sold, and as of December 31, 2011 there are no restrictions that materially limited the Company's ability to re-pledge or sell the remaining $317.5 million of client collateral.
Trading securities on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition includes $0.9 million and $0.9 million pledged to clearing organizations at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.
LPL Financial provides brokerage, clearing and custody services on a fully disclosed basis; offers its investment advisory programs and platforms; and provides technology and additional processing and related services to the advisors of the broker-dealer subsidiary of a large global insurance company and their clients under a multi-year agreement. Termination fees may be payable by a terminating or breaching party depending on the specific cause of termination.
11. Stockholders' Equity
Share-Based Compensation
Certain employees, advisors, officers and directors participate in various stock option plans. In addition, certain financial institutions participate in a warrant plan. Stock options and warrants generally vest in equal increments over a three- to five-year period and expire on the tenth anniversary following the date of grant.
The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense related to employee stock option awards based on the grant date fair value over the requisite service period of the award, which generally equals the vesting period. The Company recognized share-based compensation related to the vesting of employee stock option awards of $4.3 million and $3.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $8.5 million and $7.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, which is included in compensation and benefits on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. As of June 30, 2012, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted was $45.6 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.60 years.
The Company recognizes share-based compensation expense for stock options and warrants awarded to its advisors and financial institutions based on the fair value of the awards at each interim reporting period. The Company recognized share-based compensation of $0.4 million and $0.9 million during the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and $2.8 million and $1.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to the vesting of stock options and warrants awarded to its advisors and financial institutions, which is classified within commissions and advisory fee expense on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. As of June 30, 2012, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted was $14.6 million for advisors and financial institutions, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.38 years.
On May 8, 2012, the Company awarded 22,092 shares of common stock in conjunction with the acquisition of Fortigent, at a price of $33.95 per share, which resulted in share-based compensation expense of $0.8 million during the second quarter of 2012.
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
On November 19, 2008, the Company established an unfunded, unsecured deferred compensation plan to permit employees and former employees who held non-qualified stock options issued under the 2005 Stock Option Plan for Incentive Stock Options and 2005 Stock Option Plan for Non-qualified Stock Options that were to expire in 2009 and 2010, to receive stock units under the 2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan ("Deferred Compensation Plan"). On February 22, 2012, the Company distributed 1,673,556 shares, net of shares withheld to satisfy withholding tax requirements, pursuant to the terms of the Deferred Compensation Plan. Distributions to participants were made in the form of whole shares of common stock equal to the number of stock units allocated to the participant's account, with fractional shares paid out in cash. Participants authorized the Company to withhold shares from their distribution of common stock to satisfy their withholding tax obligations. Accordingly on February 22, 2012, the Company repurchased 1,149,896 shares and paid $37.5 million of cash consideration related to tax withholdings. The repurchase of shares was executed under the share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors on August 16, 2011.
Special Dividend
On March 30, 2012, the Company's Board of Directors approved a special dividend of $2.00 per share to common stockholders. The dividend of $222.6 million was paid on May 25, 2012 to stockholders of record as of May 15, 2012.
Share Repurchase Program
On August 16, 2011, the Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program pursuant to which the Company may repurchase up to $70.0 million of its outstanding shares of common stock through August 31, 2012. The purchases are effected in open market transactions with the timing of purchases and the amount of stock purchased determined at the discretion of the Company's management. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company repurchased 1.7 million shares of common stock at a weighted-average price of $32.78 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $55.9 million. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had repurchased 2.0 million shares of common stock at a weighted-average price of $32.05 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $64.9 million under this share repurchase program.
On May 25, 2012, the Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program pursuant to which the Company may repurchase an additional $75.0 million of its outstanding shares of common stock. There is no expiration date for this share repurchase program. The purchases may be effected in open market or privately negotiated transactions with the timing of purchases and the amount of stock purchased, generally determined at the discretion of the Company's management. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had made no repurchases of shares of common stock under this share repurchase program.
12. Earnings Per Share
Prior to February 22, 2012, the Company was required to calculate earnings per share using the two-class method by allocating a portion of its earnings to employees who held stock units containing non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents under its Deferred Compensation Plan. Basic earnings per share was computed by dividing income less earnings attributable to employees that held stock units under the Deferred Compensation Plan by the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share was computed in a manner similar to basic earnings per share, except the weighted average number of shares outstanding is increased to include the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options, warrants and other stock-based awards. After the distribution of shares on February 22, 2012 pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan, the two-class method was no longer applicable.
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
A reconciliation of the income used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Basic earnings per share: | | | | | |
| | |
|
Net income, as reported | $ | 39,502 |
| | $ | 45,507 |
| | $ | 80,681 |
| | $ | 94,506 |
|
Allocation of undistributed earnings to stock units | — |
| | (582 | ) | | — |
| | (1,212 | ) |
Net income, for computing basic earnings per share | $ | 39,502 |
| | $ | 44,925 |
| | $ | 80,681 |
| | $ | 93,294 |
|
Diluted earnings per share: | | | | | |
| | |
|
Net income, as reported | $ | 39,502 |
| | $ | 45,507 |
| | $ | 80,681 |
| | $ | 94,506 |
|
Allocation of undistributed earnings to stock units | — |
| | (561 | ) | | — |
| | (1,167 | ) |
Net income, for computing diluted earnings per share | $ | 39,502 |
| | $ | 44,946 |
| | $ | 80,681 |
| | $ | 93,339 |
|
A reconciliation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding | 110,820 |
| | 109,055 |
| | 109,888 |
| | 108,932 |
|
Dilutive common share equivalents | 2,014 |
| | 4,095 |
| | 2,791 |
| | 4,223 |
|
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding(1) | 112,834 |
| | 113,150 |
| | 112,679 |
| | 113,155 |
|
________________________________
| |
(1) | Included within the weighted average share count for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, are approximately 850,000 shares resulting from the distribution pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan (see Note 11) that were not included in the weighted average share count for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. |
Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Basic earnings per share | $ | 0.36 |
| | $ | 0.41 |
| | $ | 0.73 |
| | $ | 0.86 |
|
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 0.35 |
| | $ | 0.40 |
| | $ | 0.72 |
| | $ | 0.82 |
|
The computation of diluted earnings per share excluded stock options and warrants to purchase 3,796,356 shares and 2,975,485 shares for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, and 3,558,814 shares and 3,181,435 shares for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, because the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
13. Related Party Transactions
One of the Company’s majority stockholders owns a minority interest in Artisan Partners Limited Partnership (“Artisan”), which pays fees in exchange for product distribution and record-keeping services. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company earned $1.7 million and $1.5 million, respectively, in fees from Artisan. Additionally, as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, Artisan owed the Company $0.9 million and $0.7 million, respectively, which is included in receivables from product sponsors, broker-dealers and clearing
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
organizations on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition.
American Beacon Advisor, Inc. (“American Beacon”), a company majority-owned by one of the Company’s majority stockholders, pays fees in exchange for product distribution and record-keeping services. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company earned $0.2 million in fees from American Beacon. At June 30, 2012, American Beacon owed the Company $0.2 million, which is included in receivables from product sponsors, broker-dealers and clearing organizations on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition
One of the Company’s majority stockholders owns a minority interest in XOJET, Inc. (“XOJET”), which provides chartered aircraft services. The Company paid $0.5 million and $1.0 million to XOJET during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Aplifi, Inc. ("Aplifi"), a privately held technology company in which the Company holds an equity interest, provides software licensing for annuity order entry and compliance. The Company paid $0.5 million and $1.0 million to Aplifi for such services during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
An immediate family member of one of the Company’s executive officers, is an executive officer of CresaPartners LLC (“CresaPartners”). CresaPartners provides the Company and its subsidiaries real estate advisory, transaction and project management services. The Company paid $0.1 million and $0.3 million to CresaPartners during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
One of the Company's stockholders, TPG Capital ("TPG") provided the Company with consulting services. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company paid $0.2 million to TPG.
14. Net Capital and Regulatory Requirements
The Company’s registered broker-dealers are subject to the SEC’s Uniform Net Capital Rule (Rule 15c3-1 under the Exchange Act), which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital, as defined. Net capital is calculated for each broker-dealer subsidiary individually. Excess net capital of one broker-dealer subsidiary may not be used to offset a net capital deficiency of another broker-dealer subsidiary. Net capital and the related net capital requirement may fluctuate on a daily basis.
Net capital and net capital requirements for the Company’s broker-dealer subsidiaries as of June 30, 2012 are presented in the following table (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Capital | | Minimum Net Capital Required | | Excess Net Capital |
LPL Financial LLC | $ | 124,777 |
| | $ | 6,042 |
| | $ | 118,735 |
|
UVEST Financial Services Group, Inc. | $ | 20,661 |
| | $ | 281 |
| | $ | 20,380 |
|
LPL Financial is a clearing broker-dealer and UVEST is an introducing broker-dealer. In connection with the Company's 2011 initiative to consolidate UVEST with LPL Financial, UVEST has withdrawn its registration with FINRA effective July 16, 2012, and is no longer subject to net capital filing requirements. PTC is also subject to various regulatory capital requirements. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, LPL Financial, UVEST and PTC have met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
The Company operates in a highly regulated industry. Applicable laws and regulations restrict permissible activities and investments. These policies require compliance with various financial and customer-related regulations. The consequences of noncompliance can include substantial monetary and non-monetary sanctions. In addition, the Company is also subject to comprehensive examinations and supervision by various governmental and self-regulatory agencies. These regulatory agencies generally have broad discretion to prescribe greater limitations on the operations of a regulated entity for the protection of investors or public interest. Furthermore,
LPL FINANCIAL HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
where the agencies determine that such operations are unsafe or unsound, fail to comply with applicable law, or are otherwise inconsistent with the laws and regulations or with the supervisory policies, greater restrictions may be imposed.
15. Financial Instruments with Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Risk and Concentrations of Credit Risk
LPL Financial’s client securities activities are transacted on either a cash or margin basis. In margin transactions, LPL Financial extends credit to the advisor's client, subject to various regulatory and internal margin requirements, collateralized by cash and securities in the client’s account. As clients write options contracts or sell securities short, LPL Financial may incur losses if the clients do not fulfill their obligations and the collateral in the clients’ accounts is not sufficient to fully cover losses that clients may incur from these strategies. To control this risk, LPL Financial monitors margin levels daily and clients are required to deposit additional collateral, or reduce positions, when necessary.
LPL Financial is obligated to settle transactions with brokers and other financial institutions even if its advisor's clients fail to meet their obligation to LPL Financial. Clients are required to complete their transactions on the settlement date, generally three business days after the trade date. If clients do not fulfill their contractual obligations, LPL Financial may incur losses. In addition, the Company occasionally enters into certain types of contracts to fulfill its sale of when, as, and if issued securities. When, as, and if issued securities have been authorized but are contingent upon the actual issuance of the security. LPL Financial has established procedures to reduce this risk by generally requiring that clients deposit cash and/or securities into their account prior to placing an order.
LPL Financial may at times hold equity securities on both a long and short basis that are recorded on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition at market value. While long inventory positions represent LPL Financial’s ownership of securities, short inventory positions represent obligations of LPL Financial to deliver specified securities at a contracted price, which may differ from market prices prevailing at the time of completion of the transaction. Accordingly, both long and short inventory positions may result in losses or gains to LPL Financial as market values of securities fluctuate. To mitigate the risk of losses, long and short positions are marked-to-market daily and are continuously monitored by LPL Financial.
16. Subsequent Events
On July 10, 2012, the Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Veritat Advisors, Inc. ("Veritat"). The Company paid $5.1 million at the closing of the transaction. The Company may be required to pay future consideration to the former Veritat shareholders that is contingent upon the achievement of certain assets under management milestones and employee retention. The maximum amount of contingent payments is $14.9 million over the next five years. Veritat is a registered investment advisory firm that developed and utilizes a proprietary online financial planning platform designed to support advisors who serve the mass market. This strategic acquisition will enhance the technological capabilities of the Company's recent initiative intended to serve the mass market by increasing the flexibility of its service offering.
On July 30, 2012, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.12 per share on the Company's outstanding common stock to be paid on August 30, 2012 to all stockholders of record on August 15, 2012.
******
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
We provide an integrated platform of brokerage and investment advisory services to over 13,100 independent financial advisors and financial advisors at financial institutions (our "advisors") across the country, enabling them to successfully service their retail investors (their "clients") with objective, conflict-free financial advice. In addition, we support approximately 4,500 financial advisors who are affiliated and licensed with insurance companies with customized clearing, advisory platforms and technology solutions. Our singular focus is to provide our advisors with the front-, middle- and back-office support they need to serve the large and growing market for independent investment advice, particularly in the mass affluent market. We believe we are the only company that offers advisors the unique combination of an integrated technology platform, comprehensive self-clearing services and full open-architecture access to leading financial products, all delivered in an environment unencumbered by conflicts from product manufacturing, underwriting or market making.
For over 20 years we have served the independent advisor market. We currently support the largest independent advisor base and we believe we have the fourth largest overall advisor base in the United States based on the information available as of the date this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q has been issued. Through our advisors, we are also one of the largest distributors of financial products in the United States. Our scale is a substantial competitive advantage and enables us to more effectively attract and retain advisors. Our unique model allows us to invest more resources in our advisors, increasing their revenues and creating a virtuous cycle of growth. We currently have approximately 2,900 employees with headquarters in Boston, Charlotte and San Diego.
Our Sources of Revenue
Our revenues are derived primarily from fees and commissions from products and advisory services offered by our advisors to their clients, a substantial portion of which we pay out to our advisors, as well as fees we receive from our advisors for use of our technology, custody and clearing platforms. We also generate asset-based fees through the distribution of financial products for a broad range of product manufacturers. Under our self-clearing platform, we custody the majority of client assets invested in these financial products, which includes providing statements, transaction processing and ongoing account management. In return for these services, mutual funds, insurance companies, banks and other financial product manufacturers pay us fees based on asset levels or number of accounts managed. We also earn interest from margin loans made to our advisors’ clients.
We track recurring revenue, a characterization of net revenue and statistical measure, which we define to include our revenues from asset-based fees, advisory fees, trailing commissions, cash sweep programs and certain other fees that are based upon accounts and advisors. Because certain recurring revenues are associated with asset balances, they will fluctuate depending on the market value of the asset balances and current interest rates. Accordingly, recurring revenue can be negatively impacted by adverse external market conditions. However, recurring revenue is meaningful to us despite these fluctuations because it is not based on transaction volumes or other activity-based fees, which are more difficult to predict, particularly in declining or volatile markets.
The table below summarizes the sources of our revenue, the primary drivers of each revenue source and the percentage of each revenue source that represents recurring revenue, a characterization of revenue and a statistical measure:
|
| | | | | |
| | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 |
| Sources of Revenue | Primary Drivers | Total (millions) | % of Total Net Revenue | % Recurring |
Advisor-driven revenue with ~85%-90% payout ratio | Commissions | - Transactions - Brokerage asset levels | $911 | 50% | 38% |
Advisory Fees | - Advisory asset levels | $519 | 29% | 98% |
Attachment revenue retained by us | Asset-Based Fees - Cash Sweep Fees - Sponsorship Fees - Record Keeping | - Cash balances - Interest rates - Number of accounts - Client asset levels | $200 | 11% | 100% |
Transaction and Other Fees - Transactions - Client (Investor) Accounts - Advisor Seat and Technology | - Client activity - Number of clients - Number of advisors - Number of accounts - Premium technology subscribers | $154 | 9% | 64% |
Interest and Other Revenue | - Margin accounts - Marketing re-allowance fees | $26 | 1% | 44% |
| Total Net Revenue | $1,810 | 100% | 64% |
| Total Recurring Revenue | $1,161 | 64% | |
| |
• | Commissions and Advisory Fees. Commissions and advisory fees both represent advisor-generated revenue, generally 85-90% of which is paid to advisors. |
Commissions. Transaction-based commission revenues primarily represent gross commissions generated by our advisors, primarily from commissions earned on the sale of various financial products such as variable and fixed annuities, mutual funds, general securities, fixed income, alternative investments and insurance. The levels of transaction based commissions can vary from period to period based on the overall economic environment, number of trading days in the reporting period and investment activity of our advisors' clients. We also earn trailing commission revenues (a commission that is paid over time, such as 12(b)-1 fees) on mutual funds and variable annuities held by clients of our advisors. Trailing commissions are recurring in nature and are earned based on the current market value of investment holdings.
Advisory Fees. Advisory fee revenues represent fees charged on our corporate Registered Investment Advisor ("RIA") platform to clients of our advisors based on the value of advisory assets. Advisory fees are typically billed to clients quarterly, in advance, and are recognized as revenue ratably during the quarter. The value of the assets in the advisory account on the billing date determines the amount billed, and accordingly, the revenues earned in the following three month period. The majority of our accounts are billed using values as of the last business day of the calendar quarter. In addition, we support independent Registered Investment Advisors ("Independent RIA") who conduct their advisory business through separate entities by establishing their own RIA pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, rather than using our corporate registered RIA. The assets held under these investment advisory accounts custodied with LPL Financial LLC (“LPL Financial”) are included in our advisory and brokerage assets and advisory assets under management metrics. The fee-based production generated by the Independent RIA is earned by the
advisor, and accordingly not included in our advisory fee revenue. However, there are administrative fees charged to Independent RIAs including custody and clearing and trading fees, based on the value of assets within these advisory accounts. Furthermore, we support certain financial advisors with customized clearing and advisory platforms and charge fees to these advisors based on the value of assets within these advisory accounts.
| |
• | Asset-Based Fees. Asset-based fees are comprised of fees from cash sweep programs, our sponsorship programs with financial product manufacturers, and omnibus processing and networking services. Pursuant to contractual arrangements, uninvested cash balances in our advisors’ client accounts are swept into either insured deposit accounts at various banks or third-party money market funds, for which we receive fees, including administrative and record-keeping fees based on account type and the invested balances. In addition, we receive fees from certain financial product manufacturers in connection with sponsorship programs that support our marketing and sales-force education and training efforts. Our omnibus and networking fees represent fees paid to us in exchange for administrative and record-keeping services that we provide to clients of our advisors. Omnibus fees, paid to us by mutual fund manufacturers, are correlated to assets serviced while networking fees, paid to us by mutual fund and annuity product manufacturers, are correlated to the number of positions we administer. |
| |
• | Transaction and Other Fees. Revenues earned from transaction and other fees primarily consist of transaction fees and ticket charges, subscription fees, Individual Retirement Account ("IRA") custodian fees, contract and license fees, conference fees and other client account fees. We charge fees to our advisors and their clients for executing transactions in brokerage and fee-based advisory accounts. We earn subscription fees for various services provided to our advisors and on IRA custodial services that we provide for their client accounts. We charge monthly administrative fees to our advisors. We charge fees to financial product manufacturers for participating in our training and marketing conferences. In addition, we host certain advisor conferences that serve as training, sales and marketing events. During the reporting periods that these conferences are held we anticipate higher transaction and other fees resulting from the collection of revenues from sponsors and advisors, in comparison to other periods. |
| |
• | Other Revenue. Other revenue includes marketing re-allowance fees from certain financial product manufacturers as well as interest income from client margin accounts and cash equivalents, net of operating interest expense, and other items. |
Our Operating Expenses
| |
• | Production Expenses. Production expenses are comprised of the following: base payout amounts that are earned by and paid out to advisors based on commissions and advisory fees earned on each client's account (collectively, commissions and advisory fees earned are referred to as gross dealer concessions, or "GDC"); bonuses earned by advisors based on the levels of commissions and advisory fees they produce; the recognition of share-based compensation expense from stock options and warrants granted to advisors and financial institutions based on the fair value of the awards at each interim reporting period; a mark-to-market gain or loss on amounts designated by advisors as deferred commissions in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan at each interim reporting period; and brokerage, clearing and exchange fees. Our production payout ratio is calculated as production expenses excluding brokerage, clearing and exchange fees, divided by commissions and advisory revenues. |
We characterize production payout, which includes all production expenses except brokerage, clearing and exchange fees, as either GDC sensitive or non-GDC sensitive. Base payout amounts and production bonuses earned by and paid to advisors are GDC sensitive because they are variable and highly correlated to the level of our commissions and advisory revenues in a particular reporting period. Non-GDC sensitive payout is correlated to market movement in addition to the value of our stock. Non-GDC sensitive payout includes share-based compensation expense from stock options and warrants granted to advisors and financial institutions based on the fair value of the awards at each interim reporting period, and mark-to-market gains or losses on amounts designated by advisors as deferred commissions in a non-qualified deferred compensation plan.
The following table is presented as an illustration of how the aforementioned production expenses impact our payout ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2012:
|
| | |
Base payout rate | 84.26 | % |
Production based bonuses | 2.08 | % |
GDC sensitive payout | 86.34 | % |
Non-GDC sensitive payout | 0.23 | % |
Total Payout Ratio | 86.57 | % |
________________________________
See Results of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and comparative 2011 periods' analyses of production payout ratio.
| |
• | Compensation and Benefits Expense. Compensation and benefits expense includes salaries and wages and related employee benefits and taxes for our employees (including share-based compensation), as well as compensation for temporary employees and consultants. |
| |
• | General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses include promotional fees, occupancy and equipment, communications and data processing, regulatory fees, travel and entertainment, professional services and other expenses. We host certain advisor conferences that serve as training, sales and marketing events. During the reporting periods that these conferences are held, we anticipate higher general and administrative expenses in comparison to other periods. |
| |
• | Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense represents the benefits received for using long-lived assets. Those assets represent significant intangible assets established through our acquisitions, as well as fixed assets which include internally developed software, hardware, leasehold improvements and other equipment. |
| |
• | Restructuring Charges. Restructuring charges represent expenses incurred as a result of our 2011 consolidation of UVEST Financial Services Group, Inc. ("UVEST") and our 2009 consolidation of Mutual Service Corporation (“MSC”), Associated Financial Group, Inc. (“AFG”), Associated Securities Corp. (“Associated”), Associated Planners Investment Advisory, Inc. (“APIA”) and Waterstone Financial Group, Inc. (“WFG”) (MSC, AFG, Associated, APIA and WFG, are collectively referred to herein as the “Affiliated Entities”). |
How We Evaluate Our Business
We focus on several business and key financial metrics in evaluating the success of our business relationships and our resulting financial position and operating performance. Our key metrics as of and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| As of June 30, | | |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | % Change |
| | | | | |
Business Metrics (unaudited) | | | | | |
Advisors(1) | 13,185 |
| | 12,660 |
| | 4.1 | % |
Advisory and brokerage assets (in billions)(2) | $ | 353.0 |
| | $ | 340.8 |
| | 3.6 | % |
Advisory assets under management (in billions)(3) | $ | 111.4 |
| | $ | 103.2 |
| | 7.9 | % |
Net new advisory assets (in billions)(4) | $ | 5.3 |
| | $ | 6.8 |
| | (22.1 | )% |
Insured cash account balances (in billions)(3) | $ | 14.6 |
| | $ | 13.2 |
| | 10.6 | % |
Money market account balances (in billions)(3) | $ | 8.5 |
| | $ | 8.2 |
| | 3.7 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| | | | | | | |
Financial Metrics (unaudited) | | | | | | | |
Revenue growth from prior period | 1.5 | % | | 13.1 | % | | 2.4 | % | | 15.3 | % |
Recurring revenue as a % of net revenue(5) | 65.3 | % | | 62.4 | % | | 64.2 | % | | 61.3 | % |
Net income (in millions) | $ | 39.5 |
| | $ | 45.5 |
| | $ | 80.7 |
| | $ | 94.5 |
|
Earnings per share (diluted) | $ | 0.35 |
| | $ | 0.40 |
| | $ | 0.72 |
| | $ | 0.82 |
|
Non-GAAP Measures: | | | | | | | |
Gross margin (in millions)(6) | $ | 277.7 |
| | $ | 259.9 |
| | $ | 552.6 |
| | $ | 529.5 |
|
Gross margin as a % of net revenue(6) | 30.6 | % | | 29.1 | % | | 30.5 | % | | 29.9 | % |
Adjusted EBITDA (in millions) | $ | 111.6 |
| | $ | 123.0 |
| | $ | 236.5 |
| | $ | 247.3 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of net revenue | 12.3 | % | | 13.8 | % | | 13.1 | % | | 14.0 | % |
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of gross margin(6) | 40.2 | % | | 47.3 | % | | 42.8 | % | | 46.7 | % |
Adjusted Earnings (in millions) | $ | 55.0 |
| | $ | 58.8 |
| | $ | 118.2 |
| | $ | 118.2 |
|
Adjusted Earnings per share (diluted) | $ | 0.49 |
| | $ | 0.52 |
| | $ | 1.05 |
| | $ | 1.04 |
|
____________
| |
(1) | Advisors are defined as those investment professionals who are licensed to do business with our broker-dealer subsidiaries. In 2011, we consolidated the operations of UVEST with LPL Financial which resulted, as expected, in attrition of 146 advisors in 2011. Excluding attrition from the integration of the UVEST platform, we added 671 net new advisors during the twelve months ended June 30, 2012, continuing to build relationships with advisors from all channels across the financial services industry. |
| |
(2) | Advisory and brokerage assets are comprised of assets that are custodied, networked and non-networked and reflect market movement in addition to new assets, inclusive of new business development and net of attrition. Such totals do not include the market value of client assets held in retirement plans administered by us, trust assets supported by Concord Capital Partners ("Concord") and assets supported by Fortigent Holdings Company, Inc. |
| |
(3) | Advisory assets under management, insured cash account balances and money market account balances are components of advisory and brokerage assets. |
| |
(4) | Represents net new advisory assets consisting of funds from new accounts and additional funds deposited into existing advisory accounts that are custodied in our fee-based advisory platforms. Net new advisory assets for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 were $2.8 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively. |
| |
(5) | Recurring revenue, a characterization of net revenue and a statistical measure, is derived from sources such as advisory fees, asset-based fees, trailing commission fees, fees related to our cash sweep |
programs, interest earned on margin accounts and technology and service fees, and is not meant as a substitute for net revenues.
| |
(6) | Gross margin is calculated as net revenues less production expenses. Production expenses consist of the following expense categories from our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income: (i) commissions and advisory fees and (ii) brokerage, clearing and exchange. All other expense categories, including depreciation and amortization, are considered general and administrative in nature. Because our gross margin amounts do not include any depreciation and amortization expense, we consider our gross margin amounts to be non-GAAP measures that may not be comparable to those of others in our industry. |
Adjusted EBITDA
Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA (net income plus interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization), further adjusted to exclude certain non-cash charges and other adjustments set forth below. We present Adjusted EBITDA because we consider it an important measure of our performance. Adjusted EBITDA is a useful financial metric in assessing our operating performance from period to period by excluding certain items that we believe are not representative of our core business, such as certain material non-cash items and other adjustments.
We believe that Adjusted EBITDA, viewed in addition to, and not in lieu of, our reported GAAP results, provides useful information to investors regarding our performance and overall results of operations for the following reasons:
| |
• | because non-cash equity grants made to employees at a certain price and point in time do not necessarily reflect how our business is performing at any particular time, share-based compensation expense is not a key measure of our operating performance and |
| |
• | because costs associated with acquisitions and the resulting integrations, debt refinancing, restructuring and conversions and equity issuance and related offering costs can vary from period to period and transaction to transaction, expenses associated with these activities are not considered a key measure of our operating performance. |
We use Adjusted EBITDA:
| |
• | as a measure of operating performance; |
| |
• | for planning purposes, including the preparation of budgets and forecasts; |
| |
• | to allocate resources to enhance the financial performance of our business; |
| |
• | to evaluate the effectiveness of our business strategies; |
| |
• | in communications with our board of directors concerning our financial performance and |
| |
• | as a factor in determining employee and executive bonuses. |
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure and does not purport to be an alternative to net income as a measure of operating performance or to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of net income, operating income or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP.
Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
| |
• | Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect all cash expenditures, future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; |
| |
• | Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, working capital needs; |
| |
• | Adjusted EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt and |
| |
• | Adjusted EBITDA can differ significantly from company to company depending on long-term strategic decisions regarding capital structure, the tax jurisdictions in which companies operate and capital investments, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. |
Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as a measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in our business. We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on the GAAP results and using Adjusted EBITDA as supplemental information.
Set forth below is a reconciliation from our net income to Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| (unaudited) |
Net income | $ | 39,502 |
| | $ | 45,507 |
| | $ | 80,681 |
| | $ | 94,506 |
|
Interest expense | 13,439 |
| | 18,154 |
| | 29,471 |
| | 36,326 |
|
Income tax expense | 27,806 |
| | 29,972 |
| | 53,490 |
| | 62,531 |
|
Amortization of purchased intangible assets and software(1) | 9,948 |
| | 9,686 |
| | 19,780 |
| | 19,223 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of all other fixed assets | 7,464 |
| | 8,721 |
| | 14,807 |
| | 17,349 |
|
EBITDA | 98,159 |
| | 112,040 |
| | 198,229 |
| | 229,935 |
|
EBITDA Adjustments: | | | | | | | |
Employee share-based compensation expense(2) | 5,176 |
| | 3,427 |
| | 9,336 |
| | 7,287 |
|
Acquisition and integration related expenses(3) | 5,056 |
| | 1,548 |
| | 6,914 |
| | 2,964 |
|
Restructuring and conversion costs(4) | 2,164 |
| | 4,599 |
| | 4,174 |
| | 5,434 |
|
Debt extinguishment costs(5) | 109 |
| | — |
| | 16,652 |
| | — |
|
Equity issuance and related offering costs(6) | 446 |
| | 1,349 |
| | 446 |
| | 1,641 |
|
Other(7) | 469 |
| | 34 |
| | 783 |
| | 67 |
|
Total EBITDA Adjustments | 13,420 |
| | 10,957 |
| | 38,305 |
| | 17,393 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 111,579 |
| | $ | 122,997 |
| | $ | 236,534 |
| | $ | 247,328 |
|
____________
| |
(1) | Represents amortization of intangible assets and software as a result of our purchase accounting adjustments from our merger transaction in 2005 and our various acquisitions. |
| |
(2) | Represents share-based compensation expense related to stock options awarded to employees and non-executive directors based on the grant date fair value under the Black-Scholes valuation model. |
| |
(3) | Represents acquisition and integration costs resulting from various acquisitions. |
| |
(4) | Represents organizational restructuring charges and conversion and other related costs incurred resulting from the 2011 consolidation of UVEST and the 2009 consolidation of the Affiliated Entities. As of June 30, 2012, approximately 78% and 97%, respectively, of costs related to these two initiatives have been recognized. The remaining costs largely consist of transition payments to be made in connection with these two conversions for the retention of advisors and institutions, and conversion and transfer costs that are expected to be recognized into earnings by December 2014. |
| |
(5) | Represents expenses incurred resulting from the early extinguishment and repayment of amounts outstanding under the Company's Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, including the write-off of $16.5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs that have no future economic benefit, as well as various other charges incurred in connection with the repayment under the prior senior secured credit facilities and the establishment of the new senior secured credit facilities. |
| |
(6) | Represents equity issuance and offering costs related to the closing of a secondary offering in the second quarter of 2012, and the closing of a secondary offering in the second quarter of 2011. |
| |
(7) | Represents certain excise and other taxes. |
Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share
Adjusted Earnings represents net income before: (a) share-based compensation expense, (b) amortization of intangible assets and software, a component of depreciation and amortization resulting from our merger transaction in 2005 and our various acquisitions, (c) acquisition and integration related expenses, (d) restructuring and conversion costs, (e) debt extinguishment costs, (f) equity issuance and related offering costs and (g) other. Reconciling items are tax effected using the income tax rates in effect for the applicable period, adjusted for any potentially non-deductible amounts.
Adjusted Earnings per share represents Adjusted Earnings divided by weighted average outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis.
We prepared Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share to eliminate the effects of items that we do not consider indicative of our core operating performance.
We believe that Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share, viewed in addition to, and not in lieu of, our reported GAAP results provide useful information to investors regarding our performance and overall results of operations for the following reasons:
| |
• | because non-cash equity grants made to employees at a certain price and point in time do not necessarily reflect how our business is performing, share-based compensation expense is not a key measure of our operating performance; |
| |
• | because costs associated with acquisitions and related integrations, debt refinancing, restructuring and conversions, and equity issuance and related offering costs can vary from period to period and transaction to transaction, expenses associated with these activities are not considered a key measure of our operating performance and |
| |
• | because amortization expenses can vary substantially from company to company and from period to period depending upon each company’s financing and accounting methods, the fair value and average expected life of acquired intangible assets and the method by which assets were acquired, the amortization of intangible assets obtained in acquisitions are not considered a key measure in comparing our operating performance. |
Since 2010, we have used Adjusted Earnings for internal management reporting and evaluation purposes. We also believe Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share are useful to investors in evaluating our operating performance because securities analysts use them as supplemental measures to evaluate the overall performance of companies, and our investor and analyst presentations include Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share.
Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share are not measures of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to net income or earnings per share or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP, or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of our profitability or liquidity.
We understand that, although Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share are frequently used by securities analysts and others in their evaluation of companies, they have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share in isolation, or as substitutes for an analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. In particular you should consider:
| |
• | Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; |
| |
• | Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs and |
| |
• | Other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures. |
Management compensates for the inherent limitations associated with using Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share through disclosure of such limitations, presentation of our financial statements in accordance with GAAP and reconciliation of Adjusted Earnings to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net income.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of net income to non-GAAP measures Adjusted Earnings and Adjusted Earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands, except per share data):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| (unaudited) |
Net income | $ | 39,502 |
| | $ | 45,507 |
| | $ | 80,681 |
| | $ | 94,506 |
|
After-Tax: | | | | | | | |
EBITDA Adjustments(1) | | | | | | | |
Employee share-based compensation expense(2) | 3,806 |
| | 2,677 |
| | 6,973 |
| | 5,578 |
|
Acquisition and integration related expenses(3) | 3,561 |
| | 955 |
| | 4,707 |
| | 1,829 |
|
Restructuring and conversion costs | 1,335 |
| | 2,838 |
| | 2,575 |
| | 3,353 |
|
Debt extinguishment costs | 67 |
| | — |
| | 10,274 |
| | — |
|
Equity issuance and related offering costs | 275 |
| | 832 |
| | 275 |
| | 1,012 |
|
Other | 289 |
| | 21 |
| | 483 |
| | 41 |
|
Total EBITDA Adjustments | 9,333 |
| | 7,323 |
| | 25,287 |
| | 11,813 |
|
Amortization of purchased intangible assets and software(1) | 6,138 |
| | 5,977 |
| | 12,204 |
| | 11,861 |
|
Adjusted Earnings | $ | 54,973 |
| | $ | 58,807 |
| | $ | 118,172 |
| | $ | 118,180 |
|
Adjusted Earnings per share(4) | $ | 0.49 |
| | $ | 0.52 |
| | $ | 1.05 |
| | $ | 1.04 |
|
Weighted average shares outstanding — diluted(5) | 112,834 |
| | 113,150 |
| | 112,679 |
| | 113,155 |
|
____________
| |
(1) | EBITDA Adjustments and amortization of purchased intangible assets and software have been tax effected using a federal rate of 35.0% and the applicable effective state rate which was 3.30%, net of the federal tax benefit, for the periods presented. |
| |
(2) | Represents the after-tax expense of non-qualified stock options in which we receive a tax deduction upon exercise, and the full expense impact of incentive stock options granted to employees that have vested and qualify for preferential tax treatment and conversely, we do not receive a tax deduction. Share-based compensation for vesting of incentive stock options was $1.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. For the six month periods ending June 30, 2012 and 2011, share-based compensation for vesting of incentive stock options was $3.2 million and $2.8 million, respectively. |
| |
(3) | Represents the after-tax expense of acquisition and related costs in which we receive a tax deduction, and the full expense impact of transaction costs for which we do not receive a tax deduction. Non-deductible transaction costs were $1.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. |
| |
(4) | Represents Adjusted Earnings, a non-GAAP measure, divided by weighted average number of shares outstanding on a fully diluted basis. Set forth is a reconciliation of earnings per share on a fully diluted basis as calculated in accordance with GAAP to Adjusted Earnings per share: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
| (unaudited) |
Earnings per share — diluted | $ | 0.35 |
| | $ | 0.40 |
| | $ | 0.72 |
| | $ | 0.82 |
|
Adjustment for allocation of undistributed earnings to stock units | — |
| | 0.01 |
| | — |
| | 0.01 |
|
After-Tax: | | | | | | | |
EBITDA Adjustments per share | 0.08 |
| | 0.06 |
| | 0.22 |
| | 0.11 |
|
Amortization of purchased intangible assets and software per share | 0.06 |
| | 0.05 |
| | 0.11 |
| | 0.10 |
|
Adjusted Earnings per share | $ | 0.49 |
| | $ | 0.52 |
| | $ | 1.05 |
| | $ | 1.04 |
|
(5) Included within the weighted average share count for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, is approximately 850,000 shares resulting from the distribution pursuant to the 2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan in February 2012 that were not included in the weighted average share count for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011. See Note 11 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further details.
Acquisitions, Integrations and Divestitures
From time to time we undertake acquisitions or divestitures based on opportunities in the competitive landscape. These activities are part of our overall growth strategy, but can distort comparability when reviewing revenue and expense trends for periods presented. The following describes significant acquisition and integration activities that have impacted our 2011 and 2012 results.
Acquisition of National Retirement Partners, Inc.
On February 9, 2011, we acquired certain assets of National Retirement Partners, Inc. (“NRP”). As part of the acquisition, 206 advisors previously registered with NRP transferred their securities and advisory licenses and registrations to LPL Financial. We may be required to pay future consideration to former shareholders of NRP that is contingent upon the achievement of certain revenue-based milestones in the third year following the acquisition. We estimated the fair value of the remaining contingent consideration at the close of the transaction and we re-measure contingent consideration at fair value at each interim reporting period with changes recognized in earnings.
Consolidation of UVEST Financial Services Group, Inc.
On March 14, 2011, we committed to a corporate restructuring plan to enhance our service offering, while generating efficiencies. The restructuring plan included the consolidation of the operations of our subsidiary, UVEST, with those of LPL Financial. In connection with the consolidation of UVEST, certain registered representatives formerly associated with UVEST moved to LPL Financial through a transfer of their licenses. The transfers began in July 2011 and were completed in December 2011. Following the transfer, all registered representatives and client accounts that transferred are associated with LPL Financial. UVEST has withdrawn its registration with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") effective July 16, 2012, and is no longer subject to net capital filing requirements.
We expect to improve pre-tax profitability by approximately $10.0 million per year upon the completion of integration activities by creating operational efficiencies and revenue opportunities. See Note 4 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further details on this initiative.
Acquisition of Concord Capital Partners
On June 22, 2011, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Concord. As of June 30, 2012, $1.3 million remains in an escrow account to be paid to former shareholders of Concord in accordance with the terms of the stock purchase agreement. We may be required to pay future consideration that is contingent upon the achievement of certain gross margin-based milestones for the year ended December 31, 2013. We estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration at the close of the transaction and re-measure contingent consideration at fair value at each interim reporting period with changes recognized in earnings. Concord is a registered investment advisory firm that provides technology and open architecture investment management solutions for trust departments of financial institutions
Acquisition of Fortigent Holdings Company, Inc.
On April 23, 2012, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Fortigent Holdings Company, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries Fortigent, LLC, a registered investment advisory firm, Fortigent Reporting Company, LLC, and Fortigent Strategies Company, LLC (together, "Fortigent"). Fortigent is a leading provider of high net worth solutions and consulting services to registered investment advisors, banks, and trust companies. This strategic acquisition further enhances our capabilities and offers an extension of our existing services for wealth management advisors.
Total purchase price consideration at the closing of the transaction was $38.8 million. As of June 30, 2012, $9.9 million remains in an escrow account to be paid to former shareholders of Fortigent in accordance with the terms of the stock purchase agreement.
Acquisition of Veritat Advisors, Inc.
On July 10, 2012, we acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Veritat Advisors, Inc. ("Veritat"). We paid $5.1 million at the closing of the transaction. We may be required to pay future consideration to the former Veritat shareholders that is contingent upon the achievement of certain assets under management milestones and employee retention. The maximum amount of contingent payments is $14.9 million over the next five years. Veritat is a registered investment advisory firm that developed and utilizes a proprietary online financial planning platform designed to support advisors who serve the mass market. This strategic acquisition will enhance our technological capabilities and support our recent initiative to serve the mass market by increasing the flexibility of our service offering.
Economic Overview and Impact of Financial Market Events
After a fairly steady rise in first quarter of 2012, the second quarter saw the U.S. domestic equity markets return to the volatile nature that we have experienced intermittently over the last few years. The S&P 500 fell from its March 31, 2012 close of 1,408 by 7.0% in the first two months of the quarter, before advancing 4.0% in June to close the quarter at 1,362, a 3.3% decrease for the quarter. This decline was primarily driven by continued sovereign debt concerns in Europe coupled with signs of slowing economic growth in the United States and uncertainty over ongoing United States fiscal policy. While the longer-term impact of the European debt crisis is uncertain, we continue to maintain nominal direct exposure to sovereign debt securities.
In response to these concerns and the overall economic environment, the central banks, including the Federal Reserve, have continued to maintain historically low interest rates. The average federal funds effective rate was 0.15% in the second quarter of 2012, an increase from the average of 0.09% in the second quarter of 2011. The low interest rate environment negatively impacted our revenues from client assets in our cash sweep programs. The low interest rate also impacted investor demand for fixed income securities and fixed annuities. The Federal Reserve has indicated that it plans to maintain a low interest rate environment through the end of 2014, although it has also signaled that a third round of quantitative easing will not be launched, which is reflected in the minor increases in the federal funds rate in each month during the second quarter of 2012.
Results of Operations
The following discussion presents an analysis of our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. Where appropriate, we have identified specific events and changes that affect comparability or trends, and where possible and practical, have quantified the impact of such items.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, | | | | Six Months Ended June 30, | | |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | % Change | | 2012 | | 2011 | | % Change |
| (In thousands) | | | | (In thousands) | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | |
Commissions | $ | 447,243 |
| | $ | 459,882 |
| | (2.7 | )% | | $ | 910,896 |
| | $ | 911,759 |
| | (0.1 | )% |
Advisory fees | 268,192 |
| | 264,289 |
| | 1.5 | % | | 519,173 |
| | 508,376 |
| | 2.1 | % |
Asset-based fees | 102,784 |
| | 90,504 |
| | 13.6 | % | | 200,025 |
| | 180,327 |
| | 10.9 | % |
Transaction and other fees | 78,894 |
| | 68,755 |
| | 14.7 | % | | 153,466 |
| | 142,504 |
| | 7.7 | % |
Other | 10,730 |
| | 10,566 |
| | 1.6 | % | | 26,056 |
| | 24,899 |
| | 4.6 | % |
Net revenues | 907,843 |
| | 893,996 |
| | 1.5 | % | | 1,809,616 |
| | 1,767,865 |
| | 2.4 | % |
Expenses | | | | |
| | | | | | |
Production | 630,136 |
| | 634,088 |
| | (0.6 | )% | | 1,257,043 |
| | 1,238,415 |
| | 1.5 | % |
Compensation and benefits | 93,034 |
| | 81,410 |
| | 14.3 | % | | 182,046 |
| | 165,552 |
| | 10.0 | % |
General and administrative | 84,457 |
| | 61,644 |
| | 37.0 | % | | 152,023 |
| | 128,612 |
| | 18.2 | % |
Depreciation and amortization | 17,412 |
| | 18,407 |
| | (5.4 | )% | | 34,587 |
| | 36,572 |
| | (5.4 | )% |
Restructuring charges | 2,057 |
| | 4,814 |
| | (57.3 | )% | | 3,751 |
| | 5,351 |
| | (29.9 | )% |
Total operating expenses | 827,096 |
| | 800,363 |
| | 3.3 | % | | 1,629,450 |
| | 1,574,502 |
| | 3.5 | % |
Non-operating interest expense | 13,439 |
| | 18,154 |
| | (26.0 | )% | | 29,471 |
| | 36,326 |
| | (18.9 | )% |
Loss on extinguishment of debt | — |
| | — |
| | * |
| | 16,524 |
| | — |
| | * |
|
Total expenses | 840,535 |
| | 818,517 |
| | 2.7 | % | | 1,675,445 |
| | 1,610,828 |
| | 4.0 | % |
Income before provision for income taxes | 67,308 |
| | 75,479 |
| | (10.8 | )% | | 134,171 |
| | 157,037 |
| | (14.6 | )% |
Provision for income taxes | 27,806 |
| | 29,972 |
| | (7.2 | )% | | 53,490 |
| | 62,531 |
| | (14.5 | )% |
Net income | $ | 39,502 |
| | $ | 45,507 |
| | (13.2 | )% | | $ | 80,681 |
| | $ | 94,506 |
| | (14.6 | )% |
____________
* Not Meaningful
Revenues
Commissions
The following table sets forth our commission revenue, by product category included in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended June 30, |
| 2012 | | % Total | | 2011 | | % Total | | Change | | % Change |
Variable annuities | $ | 202,710 |
| | 45.3 | % | | $ | 201,496 |
| | 43.8 | % | | $ | 1,214 |
| | 0.6 | % |
Mutual funds | 122,128 |
| | 27.3 | % | | 130,933 |
| | 28.5 | % | | (8,805 | ) | | (6.7 | )% |
Alternative investments | 33,189 |
| | 7.4 | % | | 26,467 |
| | 5.7 | % | | 6,722 |
| | 25.4 | % |
Fixed annuities | 27,062 |
| | 6.0 | % | | 36,703 |
| | 8.0 | % | | (9,641 | ) | | (26.3 | )% |
Equities | 23,207 |
| | 5.2 | % | | 24,466 |
| | 5.3 | % | | (1,259 | ) | | (5.1 | )% |
Fixed income | 19,982 |
| | 4.5 | % | | 22,019 |
| | 4.8 | % | | (2,037 | ) | | (9.3 | )% |
Insurance | 18,647 |
| | 4.2 | % | | 16,945 |
| | 3.7 | % | | 1,702 |
| | 10.0 | % |
Other | 318 |
| | 0.1 | % | | 853 |
| | 0.2 | % | | (535 | ) | | (62.7 | )% |
Total commission revenue | $ | 447,243 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 459,882 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | (12,639 | ) | |
|
|
Commission revenue decreased by $12.6 million, or 2.7%, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared with 2011. The continued low interest rate environment, which has reduced investor demand for fixed annuities and fixed income securities, is reflected in the decline in commission revenues for these two products.
The combination of low interest rates and market volatility impacted sales commissions for variable annuities due to its impact on product design. Recently, insurers have been lowering the amount of risk they are willing to retain on variable annuity products by reducing certain insurance benefits, thereby making the products less attractive to investors. The slight growth in revenues for variable annuities is based on increased trail-based commissions.
The decrease seen in mutual fund commission revenue is a result of a slower rate of mutual fund sales combined with an increased rate of mutual fund redemptions. The increase in alternative investments is reflective of investor preferences for diversification and non-correlated ways to earn return outside of the traditional equity and fixed income markets. Income producing alternative strategies continue to grow in popularity as the needs of investors shift toward distribution, while insurance commissions increased on improved single premium life sales.
The following table sets forth our commission revenue, by product category included in our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2012 | | % Total | | 2011 | | % Total | | Change | | % Change |
Variable annuities | $ | 406,755 |
| | 44.7 | % | | $ | 396,573 |
| | 43.5 | % | | $ | 10,182 |
| | 2.6 | % |
Mutual funds | 244,806 |
| | 26.9 | % | | 249,090 |
| | 27.3 | % | | (4,284 | ) | | (1.7 | )% |
Alternative investments | 71,595 |
| | 7.9 | % | | 54,443 |
| | 6.0 | % | | 17,152 |
| | 31.5 | % |
Fixed annuities | 55,819 |
| | 6.1 | % | | 79,454 |
| | 8.7 | % | | (23,635 | ) | | (29.7 | )% |
Equities | 49,363 |
| | 5.4 | % | | 52,302 |
| | 5.7 | % | | (2,939 | ) | | (5.6 | )% |
Fixed income | 42,480 |
| | 4.7 | % | | 45,502 |
| | 5.0 | % | | (3,022 | ) | | (6.6 | )% |
Insurance | 39,592 |
| | 4.2 | % | | 32,886 |
| | 3.6 | % | | 6,706 |
| | 20.4 | % |
Other | 486 |
| | 0.1 | % | | 1,509 |
| | 0.2 | % | | (1,023 | ) | | (67.8 | )% |
Total commission revenue | $ | 910,896 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 911,759 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | (863 | ) | |
|
|
Commission revenue decreased by $0.9 million, or 0.1%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with 2011. This decrease was a result of the same factors that impacted our quarterly performance.
Advisory Fees
Advisory fees increased by $3.9 million, or 1.5%, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 2011. Advisory revenue for a particular quarter is primarily driven by the level of advisory assets and market movements. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we experienced an increase in net new advisory assets of $2.8 billion resulting from strong new business development and a shift by our existing advisors toward more advisory business. The continued shift of advisors to the Independent RIA platform, a re-pricing in one of our significant agreements and market declines have partially offset the growth in advisory fees resulting from the increase in net new advisory assets.
Advisory fees increased by $10.8 million, or 2.1%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 2011. This growth was similarly supported by the same net new advisory asset flows and shift of advisors toward more advisory business that impacted our quarterly performance in addition to a positive market impact for the six months ended June 30, 2012.
The following table summarizes the activity within our advisory assets under management for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 (in billions):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Beginning of period | $ | 110.8 |
| | $ | 99.7 |
| | $ | 101.6 |
| | $ | 93.0 |
|
Net new advisory assets | 2.8 |
| | 3.1 |
| | 5.3 |
| | 6.8 |
|
Market impact and other | (2.2 | ) | | 0.4 |
| | 4.5 |
| | 3.4 |
|
End of period | $ | 111.4 |
| | $ | 103.2 |
| | $ | 111.4 |
| | $ | 103.2 |
|
Asset-Based Fees
Asset-based fees increased by $12.3 million, or 13.6%, to $102.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared with 2011. A leading factor for the increase in asset-based fees is the UVEST conversion, which enables LPL Financial to earn revenues for certain services that it performs as the clearing firm. Previously, a third-party clearing firm performed these services and retained these revenues. In addition, revenues for record-keeping services and from product sponsors, which are largely based on the underlying asset values, increased due to the impact of the higher average market indices on the value of those underlying assets and net new sales of eligible assets. The average S&P 500 index for the three months ended June 30, 2012 was 1,350, an increase of 2.4% over the average in the prior year period. Asset-based fees also include revenues from our cash sweep programs, which increased by $4.3 million, or 14.4%, to $34.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $29.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. This was driven by an increase in the assets in our cash sweep programs, which averaged $22.6 billion and $19.5 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, as retail investors increased their percentage of cash assets in response to the volatility in the financial markets.
Asset-based fees increased by $19.7 million, or 10.9%, to $200.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with 2011. Asset-based fees increased partially as a result of the UVEST conversion. In addition, revenues for record-keeping services and from product sponsors, which are largely based on the underlying asset values, increased due to the impact of the higher average market indices on the value of those underlying assets and net new sales of eligible assets. The average S&P 500 index for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was 1,349, an increase of 3.0% over the average in the prior year period. Asset-based fees also include revenues from our cash sweep programs, which increased by $7.0 million, or 11.4%, to $68.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $61.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. This was driven by an increase in the assets in our cash sweep programs, which averaged $22.0 billion and $19.2 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, as retail investors increased their percentage of cash assets in response to the volatility in the financial markets.
Transaction and Other Fees
Transaction and other fees increased by $10.1 million, or 14.7%, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared with 2011. Transaction and other fees increased due to a 4.0% increase in the average number of advisors for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 2011, increases in fees earned on those advisors
and institutions who converted to the LPL Financial platform from UVEST and increases due to a repricing of certain services. Revenues in the current quarter of 2012 also include increased conference revenues due to a shift in timing of a conference from the first quarter in 2011 to the second quarter in 2012 and fee revenues from Fortigent.
Transaction and other fees increased by $11.0 million, or 7.7%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with 2011. Transaction and other fees increased due to a 3.7% increase in the average number of advisors for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 2011, increases in fees earned on those advisors and institutions who converted to the LPL Financial platform from UVEST and increases due to a repricing of certain services. Lower volumes of trading in certain advisory accounts reduced transaction revenues partially offsetting these increases.
Other Revenue
Other revenue increased $0.2 million, or 1.6%, to $10.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 2011. The primary contributor to this increase in 2012 was direct investment marketing allowance fees received from product sponsor programs, which increased by $1.2 million compared to the same period in 2011, largely based on increased sales of alternative investments.
Other revenue increased $1.2 million, or 4.6%, to $26.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 2011. The primary contributor to this increase in 2012 was direct investment marketing allowance fees received from product sponsor programs, which increased by $3.0 million compared to the same period in 2011, largely based on increased sales of alternative investments. An additional contributor to the increase was growth in retirement sponsorship programs of $2.0 million, an effect of our acquisition of NRP.
Expenses
Production Expenses
Production expenses decreased by $4.0 million, or 0.6%, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared with 2011. This decrease is correlated with our commission and advisory revenues, which decreased by 1.2% during the same period. Our production payout was 86.74% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 86.26% for the prior year period. The base payout rate increased by 0.58% for the three months ended June 30, 2012, due to the impact from UVEST institutions that converted to the LPL Financial platform and the growth of our larger advisor practices. The increase in our production based bonuses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 reflects our advisors trend of attaining higher payout tiers earlier in the year.
Production expenses increased by $18.6 million, or 1.5%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with 2011. This increase is correlated with our commission and advisory revenues, which increased by 0.7% during the same period. Our production payout was 86.57% for the six months ended June 30, 2012, compared to 85.86% for the prior year period. The base payout rate for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with 2011 reflects increases in payout for UVEST institutions that converted to the LPL Financial platform and the growth of larger advisor practices. Our production based bonuses increased by 0.40% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 due to the incentive structures, which reward our advisors as they achieve higher production levels.
The following table shows our production payout ratio for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| For the Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 | | 2012 | | 2011 |
Base payout rate | 84.27 | % | | 83.69 | % | | 84.26 | % | | 83.91 | % |
Production based bonuses | 2.57 | % | | 2.38 | % | | 2.08 | % | | 1.68 | % |
GDC sensitive payout | 86.84 | % | | 86.07 | % | | 86.34 | % | | 85.59 | % |
Non-GDC sensitive payout | (0.10 | )% | | 0.19 | % | | 0.23 | % | | 0.27 | % |
Total Payout Ratio | 86.74 | % | | 86.26 | % | | 86.57 | % | | 85.86 | % |
Compensation and Benefits Expense
Compensation and benefits increased by $11.6 million, or 14.3%, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared with 2011. The increase was due to higher staffing levels to support higher levels of advisor and client activities and our acquisitions of Fortigent and Concord. Our average number of full-time employees increased 7.9% from 2,674 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 to 2,886 for the three months ended June 30, 2012.
Compensation and benefits increased by $16.5 million, or 10.0%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with 2011. Our average number of full-time employees increased 5.8% from 2,651 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 to 2,805 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, due to our acquisitions of Fortigent and Concord and increases in staffing to support higher levels of advisor and client activities.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased by $22.8 million, or 37.0%, to $84.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared with 2011. The primary drivers behind the increase were business development and promotional expenses, professional fees and an increase in conference expenses. The increase in conference expenses is due to an advisor conference that occurred in the first quarter of 2011 which occurred in the second quarter of 2012. Expenses of $8.0 million related to our acquisitions of Fortigent and Concord also contributed to the increase.
General and administrative expenses increased by $23.4 million, or 18.2%, to $152.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with 2011. The primary drivers behind the increase were business development and promotional expenses, professional fees and expenses related to our acquisitions of Fortigent and Concord.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
For the three months ended June 30, 2012, depreciation and amortization decreased by $1.0 million, or 5.4% compared to the prior year. This decrease is primarily due to a reduction in depreciation incurred in the second quarter of 2012, attributed to assets that became fully depreciated in 2011.
For the six months ended June 30, 2012, depreciation and amortization decreased by $2.0 million, or 5.4% compared to the prior year. This decrease is due to a reduction in depreciation incurred in the first half of 2012, attributed to assets that became fully depreciated in 2011.
Restructuring Charges
Restructuring charges represent expenses incurred as a result of our 2011 consolidation of UVEST and our 2009 consolidation of the Affiliated Entities.
Restructuring charges were $2.1 million and $3.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012. These charges relate primarily to technology costs and other expenditures incurred for the conversion and transfer of advisors and their client accounts from UVEST to LPL Financial. Refer to Note 4 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional details regarding this matter.
Restructuring charges were $4.8 million and $5.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, which related primarily to technology costs and other expenditures incurred in anticipation of the conversion and transfer of advisors and their client accounts from UVEST to LPL Financial, which began in the second quarter of 2011.
Interest Expense
Interest expense includes non-operating interest expense for our senior secured credit facilities.
Interest expense decreased $4.7 million, or 26.0%, for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared with 2011. The reduction in interest expense for 2012 is primarily due to the reduction in interest rates on our debt as a result of its refinancing in March 2012. The refinancing reduced our interest expense by $2.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 2011. Additionally, the maturity of an interest rate swap agreement with a notional value of $145.0 million on June 30, 2011, reduced our comparative interest expense by $1.6 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 2011.
Interest expense decreased $6.9 million, or 18.9%, for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with 2011. The reduction in interest expense for 2012 is due to a lowered interest rate on our debt as a result of its refinancing in March 2012 and the maturity of an interest rate swap agreement with a notional value of $145.0 million on June 30, 2011, which combined to result in a decrease to our comparative interest expense by $6.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 2011.
Loss on Extinguishment of Debt
Loss on extinguishment of debt was $16.5 million for the six months ending June 30, 2012. In March 2012, we refinanced and replaced our credit agreement primarily to extend the maturities on our borrowings and wrote off $16.5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs related to the previous credit agreement.
Provision for Income Taxes
We estimate our full-year effective income tax rate at the end of each interim reporting period. This estimate is used in providing for income taxes on a year-to-date basis and may change in subsequent interim periods. The tax rate in any quarter can be affected positively and negatively by adjustments that are required to be reported in the specific quarter of resolution. The effective income tax rates reflect the impact of state taxes, settlement contingencies and expenses that are not deductible for tax purposes.
During the three months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded income tax expense of $27.8 million, compared with $30.0 million in the prior year period. Our effective income tax rate was 41.3% and 39.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The effective income tax rate was higher in the 2012 period, due to the timing of non-deductible expenses between the first and second quarters of 2012 and a decrease in pre-tax income.
During the six months ended June 30, 2012, we recorded income tax expense of $53.5 million, compared with $62.5 million in the prior year period. Our effective income tax rate was 39.9% and 39.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Senior management establishes our liquidity and capital policies. These policies include senior management’s review of short- and long-term cash flow forecasts, review of monthly capital expenditures and daily monitoring of liquidity for our subsidiaries. Decisions on the allocation of capital are based upon, among other things, projected profitability and cash flow, risks of the business, regulatory capital requirements and future liquidity needs for strategic activities. Our Treasury Department assists in evaluating, monitoring and controlling the business activities that impact our financial condition, liquidity and capital structure and maintains relationships with various lenders. The objectives of these policies are to support the executive business strategies while ensuring ongoing and sufficient liquidity.
A summary of changes in cash flow data is provided as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
Net cash flows (used in) provided by: | | | |
Operating activities | $ | 56,113 |
| | $ | 349,716 |
|
Investing activities | (59,738 | ) | | (36,310 | ) |
Financing activities | (236,091 | ) | | (51,143 | ) |
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents | (239,716 | ) | | 262,263 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning of period | 720,772 |
| | 419,208 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents — end of period | $ | 481,056 |
| | $ | 681,471 |
|
Cash requirements and liquidity needs are primarily funded through our cash flow from operations and our capacity for additional borrowing.
Net cash used in or provided by operating activities includes net income adjusted for non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, restructuring related charges, share-based compensation, amortization of debt issuance costs, deferred income tax provision and changes in operating assets and liabilities. Operating assets and liabilities include balances related to settlement and funding of client transactions, receivables from product sponsors and accrued commissions and advisory fees due to our advisors. Operating assets and liabilities that arise from the settlement and funding of transactions by our advisors’ clients are the principal cause of changes to our net cash from operating activities and can fluctuate significantly from day to day and period to period depending on overall trends and client behaviors.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 totaled $56.1 million and $349.7 million, respectively. The change between periods is primarily due to the settlement and funding of client trading activity, which was a net use of funds of $7.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and provided funds of $158.5 million for the comparable 2011 period. Cash flows from client activities fluctuate significantly depending on market conditions and timing. In 2012 operating activities also include a $48.4 million use of cash related to excess tax benefits from share-based compensation and a $41.2 million use of funds for other assets, partially offset by a reduction of $40.6 million in tax receivables. Net cash provided by operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 includes an $181.8 million reduction in tax receivables that arose primarily from a tax benefit resulting from stock options exercised by selling stockholders in connection with our IPO and $147.7 million release of cash and securities segregated under regulations due to settlement of client trading activity, partially offset by $55.8 million of excess tax benefits resulting from stock options exercised in our IPO.
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 totaled $59.7 million and $36.3 million, respectively. The net cash used in 2012 primarily consists of $38.8 million for the acquisition of Fortigent and $18.8 million in capital expenditures. The net cash used in 2011 included $37.2 million used for the acquisition of NRP and $12.5 million in capital expenditures, offset by a $18.5 million release of restricted cash.
Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $236.1 million and $51.1 million, respectively. Cash flows used in financing activities in 2012 include $222.6 million of cash dividends paid and $55.9 million for repurchases of common stock, partially offset by $48.4 million from excess tax benefits arising from share-based compensation. Cash flows used in financing activities in 2011 include $47.0 million of cash used to pay down term loans under our senior secured credit facilities and $67.0 million used to repurchase common stock, offset by $55.8 million from excess tax benefits arising from stock options exercised related to our IPO.
We believe that based on current levels of operations and anticipated growth, cash flow from operations, together with other available sources of funds, which includes three uncommitted lines of credit available and a revolving credit facility, will be adequate to satisfy our working capital needs, the payment of all of our obligations and the funding of anticipated capital expenditures for the foreseeable future. In addition, we have certain capital requirements due to our registered broker-dealer entity and we have met all capital adequacy requirements for this entity and expect this to also continue for the foreseeable future. We regularly evaluate our existing indebtedness, including refinancing thereof, based on a number of factors, including our capital requirements, future prospects, contractual restrictions, the availability of refinancing on attractive terms and general market conditions.
In March 2012, we announced our intent to seek the ability to issue a regular quarterly cash dividend of up to $0.48 per share annually on the Company's outstanding common stock. The payment of any dividends permitted under our credit facilities are subject to approval by the Company's Board of Directors, including both timing and amount. On July 30, 2012, the Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.12 per share on the Company's outstanding common stock to be paid on August 30, 2012 to all stockholders of record on August 15, 2012.
Share Repurchase Program
On August 16, 2011, the Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program pursuant to which we may repurchase $70.0 million of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock through August 31, 2012. The timing of purchases and the amount of stock purchased will be determined at our discretion. As of June 30, 2012, we repurchased 2.0 million shares of common stock at a weighted-average price of $32.05 per share for an aggregate purchase price of $64.9 million.
On May 25, 2012, the Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program pursuant to which we may repurchase an additional $75.0 million of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock. There is no
termination date for this share repurchase program. The purchases may effected in open market or privately negotiated transactions with the timing of purchases and the amount of stock purchased generally determined at our discretion. As of June 30, 2012, the we have made no repurchases of shares of common stock under this share repurchase program.
Issuance Under 2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan
On February 22, 2012, we distributed 1,673,556 shares, net of shares withheld to satisfy withholding tax requirements of the participants, pursuant to the terms of our 2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan. Distributions to participants were made in the form of whole shares of common stock equal to the number of stock units allocated to the participant's account (fractional shares were paid out in cash). Participants authorized us to withhold shares from their distribution of common stock to satisfy their withholding tax obligations. On February 22, 2012 we repurchased 1,149,896 shares and made the related withholding tax payment of approximately $37.5 million.
In calculating earnings per share and diluted earnings per share using the two-class method, we were required to allocate a portion of our earnings to employees that held stock units that contained non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents under our 2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan. After the distribution of shares under the 2008 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan, the two-class method is no longer applicable. This distribution of shares did not have a material impact on earnings per share or diluted earnings per share. However, the distribution increased the weighted average share count for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 by approximately 850,000 shares.
Special Dividend
On March 30, 2012, the Company's Board of Directors approved a special dividend of $2.00 per share to common stockholders. The dividend of $222.6 million was paid on May 25, 2012 to stockholders of record as of May 15, 2012.
Regulatory
On July 20, 2012, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued a Notice of Proposed Adjustment (the “Notice”) asserting we are subject to a penalty with respect to an alleged untimely deposit of withholding taxes related to wages paid upon exercise of certain non-qualified stock options in connection with our initial public offering in 2010. At this time, we are unable to provide a reasonable estimate of the potential range of ultimate liability because: (i) this matter is still in the early stages of discussion, (ii) we may dispute one or more legal positions asserted by the IRS and (iii) the defenses available will be dependent on the facts and circumstances of the transactions at issue. We plan to defend our position through applicable IRS and judicial procedures, as appropriate. Although the final resolution of the proposed adjustment is uncertain, we believe that the outcome will not be material to our financial position, but any penalty paid in connection with the Notice could have a material effect on our results of operations for the particular period.
Operating Capital Requirements
Our primary requirement for working capital relates to funds we loan to our advisors’ clients for trading conducted on margin and funds we are required to maintain at clearing organizations to support these clients’ trading activities. We have several sources of funds to enable us to meet increased working capital requirements related to increased client margin activities and balances. These sources include cash and cash equivalents on hand, cash and securities segregated under federal and other regulations, and proceeds from re-pledging or selling client securities in margin accounts. When a client purchases securities on margin or uses securities as collateral to borrow from us on margin, we are permitted, pursuant to the applicable securities industry regulations, to re-pledge or sell securities which collateralize those margin accounts. As of June 30, 2012, we had received collateral in connection primarily with client margin loans with a fair value of approximately $343.5 million, which can be re-pledged or sold. Of this amount, approximately $21.2 million has been pledged to the Options Clearing Corporation as collateral to secure certain client obligations related to options positions, and approximately $23.2 million was loaned to the National Securities Clearing Corporation through participation in the Stock Borrow Program. Of the remaining $299.1 million, approximately $144.3 million of these securities are held at banks in connection with uncommitted lines of credit, which were unutilized at June 30, 2012; these securities may be used as collateral for loans from these banks. The remainder of $154.8 million has not been re-pledged or sold. There are no restrictions that materially limit our ability to re-pledge or sell the remaining $299.1 million of client collateral.
Our other working capital needs are primarily related to regulatory capital requirements at our broker-dealer and bank trust subsidiaries and software development, which we have satisfied in the past from internally generated cash flows.
Notwithstanding the self-funding nature of our operations, we may sometimes be required to fund timing differences arising from the delayed receipt of client funds associated with the settlement of client transactions in securities markets. These timing differences are funded either with internally generated cash flow or, if needed, with funds drawn on our uncommitted lines of credit at our broker-dealer subsidiary LPL Financial, and/or under our revolving credit facility.
Our registered broker-dealer is subject to the SEC’s Uniform Net Capital Rule, which requires the maintenance of minimum net capital. LPL Financial computes net capital requirements under the alternative method, which requires firms to maintain minimum net capital, as defined, equal to the greater of $250,000 or 2.0% of aggregate debit balances arising from client transactions. UVEST computed net capital requirements under the aggregate indebtedness method, which requires firms to maintain minimum net capital, as defined, of not less than 6.67% of aggregate indebtedness. In connection with the consolidation of UVEST with LPL Financial, we have withdrawn UVEST's registration with FINRA effective July 16, 2012; therefore, UVEST is no longer subject to net capital filing requirements.
LPL Financial is also subject to the National Futures Association's ("NFA") financial requirements and is required to maintain net capital that is in excess of or equal to the greatest of its minimum financial requirements. Currently the highest NFA requirement is the minimum net capital calculated pursuant to the SEC's Uniform Net Capital Rule.
In addition to the minimum net capital requirements, the SEC and FINRA have established "early warning" capital requirements for broker-dealers that when exceeded, limit certain activities of the broker-dealer. Early warning requirements provide advance warning that a firm's net capital is dropping toward its minimum requirement, allowing time for initiation of corrective action. For LPL Financial, an early warning level is reached if its ratio of aggregate customer debit balances falls below 5.0% of net capital. At June 30, 2012, LPL Financial's net capital was $124.8 million and its early warning requirement was $13.7 million. LPL Financial typically maintains net capital in excess of the early warning level to maintain its ability to grow its business, demonstrate the stability of its operations and provide a safeguard in the event of sustained levels of market volatility, as experienced by the securities industry in 2008.
LPL Financial's ability to pay dividends greater than 10% of its excess net capital during any 35 day rolling period requires approval from FINRA. In addition, payment of dividends is restricted if LPL's net capital would be less than 5.0% of aggregate customer debit balances.
Our subsidiary, PTC, is subject to various regulatory capital requirements. Failure by any of our subsidiaries to meet their respective minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Liquidity Assessment
Our ability to meet our debt service obligations and reduce our total debt will depend upon our future performance, which, in turn, will be subject to general economic, financial, business, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other conditions, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, our operating results, cash flow and capital resources may not be sufficient for repayment of our indebtedness in the future. Some risks that could materially adversely affect our ability to meet our debt service obligations include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions and economic activity in the financial markets. The performance of our business is correlated with the economy and financial markets, and a slowdown in the economy or financial markets could adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay investments, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. These measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. In the absence of sufficient cash flows and capital resources, we could face substantial liquidity constraints and might be
required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. However, our senior secured credit agreement will restrict our ability to dispose of assets and the use of proceeds from any such dispositions. We may not be able to consummate those dispositions, and even if we could consummate such dispositions, to obtain the proceeds that we could realize from them and, in any event, the proceeds may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due.
Indebtedness
On March 29, 2012, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement") with LPL Holdings, Inc., the other Credit Parties signatory thereto, the Several Lenders signatory thereto, and Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent, Collateral Agent, Letter of Credit Issuer, and Swingline Lender. The Credit Agreement refinanced and replaced our Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 24, 2010 (the "Original Credit Agreement"). Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, we established a Term Loan A tranche of $735.0 million maturing at March 29, 2017 (the "Term Loan A") and a Term Loan B tranche of $615.0 million maturing at March 29, 2019 (the "Term Loan B"). In connection with the Credit Agreement we capitalized certain debt issuance costs totaling $23.7 million. Additionally, we accelerated the recognition of $16.5 million debt issuance costs related to borrowings under the Original Credit Agreement in the six months ended June 30, 2012. As of March 31, 2012, we estimated that over the first twelve months of operations under the Credit Agreement, we anticipate interest savings of approximately $10.0 million based on a weighted average interest yield of 3.34% on the Credit Agreement compared to 4.27% on the Original Credit Agreement, excluding the portions then-hedged with our interest rate swap.
The Credit Agreement also refinanced and replaced our existing revolving credit facility, increasing our capacity from $163.5 million to $250.0 million. The new revolving credit facility will mature on March 29, 2017. There were no outstanding borrowings on this revolving credit facility at June 30, 2012.
In addition, we maintain three uncommitted lines of credit. Two of the lines have unspecified limits, and are primarily dependent on our ability to provide sufficient collateral. The other line has a $150.0 million limit and allows for both collateralized and uncollateralized borrowings. The lines were utilized in 2012 and 2011; however, there were no balances outstanding at June 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.
We also were a party to an interest rate swap agreement, in a notional amount of $65.0 million, to mitigate interest rate risk by hedging the variability of a portion of our floating-rate senior secured term loan. This agreement expired on June 30, 2012.
Interest Rate and Fees
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at a base rate equal to the one, two, three, six, nine or twelve-month LIBOR (the "Eurodollar Rate") plus our applicable margin, or an alternative base rate (“ABR”) plus our applicable margin. The ABR is equal to the greatest of (a) the prime rate in effect on such day, (b) the effective federal funds rate in effect on such day plus 0.50%, (c) the Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00% and (d) solely in the case of the Term Loan B, 2.00%.
The applicable margin for borrowings (a) with respect to the Term Loan A is currently 1.50% for base rate borrowings and 2.50% for LIBOR borrowings, and (b) with respect to the Term Loan B is currently 2.00% for base rate borrowings and 3.00% for LIBOR borrowings, and (c) with respect to the revolving credit facility is currently 1.50% for base rate borrowings and 2.50% for LIBOR borrowings. The applicable margin on our term loans and revolving credit facility could change depending on our total leverage ratio. The LIBOR rate with respect to Term Loan B shall in no event be less than 1.00%.
In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the Credit Agreement, we are required to pay a commitment fee to the lenders under the revolving credit facility in respect of the unutilized commitments thereunder. The commitment fee rate at June 30, 2012 was 0.50% for our revolving credit facility, but is subject to change depending on our leverage ratio. Prior to the closing of the Credit Agreement on March 29, 2012, the commitment fee was 0.75% on our previous revolving credit facility. We must also pay customary letter of credit fees.
Prior to the repayment on March 29, 2012, the Original Credit Agreement consisted of three term loan tranches: a $302.5 million term loan facility with a maturity of June 18, 2013 (the "2013 Term Loans"), a $476.9
million term loan facility with a maturity of June 25, 2015 (the "2015 Term Loans") and a $553.2 million term loan facility with a maturity of June 28, 2017 (the "2017 Term Loans"). The applicable margin for borrowings (a) with respect to the 2013 Term Loans was 0.75% for base rate borrowings and 1.75% for LIBOR borrowings, (b) with respect to the 2015 Term Loans was 1.75% for base rate borrowings and 2.75% for LIBOR borrowings and (c) with respect to the 2017 Term Loans was 2.75% for base rate borrowings and 3.75% for LIBOR borrowings. The $163.5 million revolver tranche had an applicable margin of 2.50% for base rate borrowings and 3.50% for LIBOR borrowings. The LIBOR rate with respect to the 2015 Term Loans and the 2017 Term Loans had a floor of 1.50%.
Prepayments
The Credit Agreement (other than the revolving credit facility) requires us to prepay outstanding amounts under our senior secured term loan facility subject to certain exceptions, with:
| |
• | 50% (percentage will be reduced to 0% if our total leverage ratio is 3.00 to 1.00 or less) of our annual excess cash flow (as defined in the Credit Agreement) adjusted for, among other things, changes in our net working capital (as of June 30, 2012 our total leverage ratio was 2.28); |
| |
• | 100% of the net cash proceeds of all nonordinary course asset sales or other dispositions of property (including insurance recoveries), if we do not reinvest or commit to reinvest those proceeds in assets to be used in our business or to make certain other permitted investments within 15 months as long as such reinvestment is completed within 180 days and |
| |
• | 100% of the net cash proceeds of any incurrence of debt, other than proceeds from debt permitted under the Credit Agreement. |
Mandatory prepayments in respect of the incurrence of any debt can be applied by us to scheduled installments of principal of the Term Loan A and Term Loan B in any order at our direction. Any other mandatory prepayments described above will be applied to scheduled installments of principal of the Term Loan A and Term Loan B in direct order.
We may voluntarily repay outstanding term loans under the Credit Agreement at any time without premium or penalty, other than customary “breakage” costs with respect to LIBOR loans, and with the exception of certain repricing transactions in respect of the Term Loan B consummated before March 29, 2013, which will be subject to a premium of 1.0% of the principal amount of Term Loan B subject to such repricing transaction.
Amortization
Quarterly repayments of the principal for Term Loan A will total 5.0% per year for years one and two and 10.0% per year for years three, four, and five, with the remaining principal due upon maturity. Quarterly repayments of the principal for Term Loan B will total 1.0% per year with the remaining principal due upon maturity. Any outstanding principle under the Revolving Credit Facility will be due upon maturity.
Guarantee and Security
The loans under the Credit Agreement are secured primarily through pledges of the capital stock in certain of our subsidiaries.
Certain Covenants and Events of Default
The Credit Agreement contains a number of covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, our ability to:
| |
• | incur additional indebtedness; |
| |
• | enter into sale and leaseback transactions; |
| |
• | engage in mergers or consolidations; |
| |
• | sell or transfer assets; |
| |
• | pay dividends and distributions or repurchase our capital stock; |
| |
• | make investments, loans or advances; |
| |
• | prepay certain subordinated indebtedness; |
| |
• | engage in certain transactions with affiliates; |
| |
• | amend material agreements governing certain subordinated indebtedness and |
| |
• | change our lines of business. |
Our Credit Agreement prohibits us from paying dividends and distributions or repurchasing our capital stock except for limited purposes, including, but not limited to payments in connection with: (i) redemption, repurchase, retirement or other acquisition of our equity interests from present or former officers, managers, consultants, employees and directors upon the death, disability, retirement, or termination of employment of any such person or otherwise in accordance with any stock option or stock appreciate rights plan, any management or employee stock ownership plan, stock subscription plan, employment termination agreement or any employment agreements or stockholders’ agreement, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $10.0 million in any fiscal year plus the amount of cash proceeds from certain equity issuances to such persons, and the amount of certain key-man life insurance proceeds, (ii) franchise taxes, general corporate and operating expenses not to exceed $3.0 million in any fiscal year, and fees and expenses related to any unsuccessful equity or debt offering permitted by the Credit Agreement, (iii) tax liabilities to the extent attributable to our business and our subsidiaries and (iv) dividends and other distributions in an aggregate amount not to exceed the sum of (a) the greater of (i) $250,000,000 and (ii) 6.75% of our consolidated total assets, (b) the available amount (as defined in the Credit Agreement) and (c) the available equity amount (as defined in the Credit Agreement). Notwithstanding the foregoing, we may make unlimited dividends and distributions provided that after giving pro forma effect thereto, our total leverage ratio does not exceed 2.0 to 1.0.
The share repurchase program approved in May 2012 was authorized by the Board of Directors pursuant to item (iv) above. Our special dividend was authorized by the Board of Directors pursuant to a one-time exception to the restriction on dividends. Any future declarations of quarterly cash dividends will be authorized pursuant to item (iv) above.
In addition, our financial covenant requirements include a total leverage ratio test and an interest coverage ratio test. Under our total leverage ratio test, we covenant not to allow the ratio of our consolidated total debt (as defined in our Credit Agreement) to an adjusted EBITDA reflecting financial covenants in our Credit Agreement (“Credit Agreement Adjusted EBITDA”) to exceed certain prescribed levels set forth in the Credit Agreement. Under our interest coverage ratio test, we covenant not to allow the ratio of our Credit Agreement Adjusted EBITDA to our consolidated interest expense (as defined in our Credit Agreement) to be less than certain prescribed levels set forth in the Credit Agreement. Each of our financial ratios is measured at the end of each fiscal quarter, beginning in with the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2012.
Our Credit Agreement provides us with a right to cure in the event we fail to comply with our leverage ratio test or our interest coverage test. We must exercise this right to cure within ten days of the delivery of our quarterly certificate calculating the financial ratios for that quarter.
If we fail to comply with these covenants and are unable to cure, we could face substantial liquidity problems and could be forced to sell assets, seek additional capital or seek to restructure or refinance our indebtedness. These alternative measures may not be successful or feasible. Our Credit Agreement restricts our ability to sell assets. Even if we could consummate those sales, the proceeds that we realize from them may not be adequate to meet any debt service obligations then due. Furthermore, if an event of default were to occur with respect to our Credit Agreement, our creditors could, among other things, accelerate the maturity of our indebtedness.
As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 we were in compliance with all of our covenant requirements. Our covenant requirements and actual ratios as of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| June 30, 2012 | | December 31, 2011 |
Financial Ratio | Covenant Requirement | | Actual Ratio | | Covenant Requirement | | Actual Ratio |
Leverage Test (Maximum) | 4.00 | | 2.28 |
| | 3.00 | | 1.77 |
Interest Coverage (Minimum) | 3.00 | | 7.78 |
| | 3.00 | | 7.10 |
Set forth below is a reconciliation from EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and Credit Agreement Adjusted EBITDA to our net income for the trailing twelve months ended June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| June 30, | | December 31, |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
Net income | $ | 156,557 |
| | $ | 170,382 |
|
Interest expense | 61,909 |
| | 68,764 |
|
Income tax expense | 103,262 |
| | 112,303 |
|
Amortization of purchased intangible assets and software(1) | 39,538 |
| | 38,981 |
|
Depreciation and amortization of all other fixed assets | 31,218 |
| | 33,760 |
|
EBITDA | 392,484 |
| | 424,190 |
|
EBITDA Adjustments: | | | |
Employee share-based compensation expense(2) | 17,027 |
| | 14,978 |
|
Acquisition and integration related expenses(3) | 135 |
| | (3,815 | ) |
Restructuring and conversion costs(4) | 20,792 |
| | 22,052 |
|
Debt extinguishment costs(5) | 16,652 |
| | — |
|
Equity issuance and related offering costs(6) | 867 |
| | 2,062 |
|
Other(7) | 969 |
| | 253 |
|
Total EBITDA Adjustments | 56,442 |
| | 35,530 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA | 448,926 |
| | 459,720 |
|
Advisor and financial institution share-based compensation expense(8) | 4,139 |
| | 3,272 |
|
Other(9) | 2,025 |
| | — |
|
Credit Agreement Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 455,090 |
| | $ | 462,992 |
|
____________
| |
(1) | Represents amortization of intangible assets and software as a result of our purchase accounting adjustments from our merger transaction in 2005 and various acquisitions. |
| |
(2) | Represents share-based compensation expense for stock options awarded to employees and non-executive directors based on the grant date fair value under the Black-Scholes valuation model. |
| |
(3) | Represents acquisition and integration costs resulting from various acquisitions. Included in the twelve months ended June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, is a cash settlement of $10.5 million for certain legal settlements that were resolved with an indemnifying party in the fourth quarter of 2011. Of this settlement, $9.8 million has been excluded from the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP measure. |
| |
(4) | Represents organizational restructuring charges and conversion and other related costs incurred resulting from the 2011 consolidation of UVEST and the 2009 consolidation of the Affiliated Entities. As of June 30, 2012, approximately 78% and 97%, respectively, of costs related to these two initiatives have been recognized. The remaining costs largely consist of transition payments to be made in connection with these two conversions for the retention of advisors and institutions, and conversion and transfer costs that are expected to be recognized into earnings by December 2014. |
| |
(5) | Represents expenses incurred resulting from the early extinguishment and repayment of amounts outstanding under the Company's Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, including the write-off of $16.5 million of unamortized debt issuance costs that have no future economic benefit, as well as various other charges incurred in connection with the repayment of the prior senior secured credit facilities and the establishment of the new Credit Agreement. |
| |
(6) | Represents equity issuance and offering costs related to the closing of a secondary offering in the second |
quarter of 2012, and the closing of a secondary offering in the second quarter of 2011.
| |
(7) | Represents certain excise and other taxes. |
| |
(8) | Credit Agreement Adjusted EBITDA excludes the recognition of share-based compensation expense from stock options and warrants granted to advisors and financial institutions based on the fair value of the awards at each interim reporting period under the Black-Scholes valuation model, as defined under the terms of the Credit Agreement. Pro-forma disclosure has been made for the trailing twelve months ended December 31, 2011, to exclude the recognition of share-based compensation expense from stock options and warrants granted to advisors and financial institutions, as if the terms of the Credit Agreement were in effect as of January 1, 2011. |
| |
(9) | Represents other items that are adjustable in accordance with our Credit Agreement to arrive at Credit Agreement Adjusted EBITDA including employee severance costs, employee signing costs, employee retention or completion bonuses, integration and facility opening costs, and transition costs related to closure or consolidation of facilities. It does not include the aforementioned expenses incurred in connection with the onboarding of advisors. |
Interest Rate Swap
An interest rate swap is a financial derivative instrument whereby two parties enter into a contractual agreement to exchange payments based on underlying interest rates. Prior to its expiration on June 30, 2012, we used an interest rate swap agreement to hedge the variability on our floating interest rate for $65.0 million of our Term Loan A under our Credit Agreement. We were required to pay the counterparty to the agreement fixed interest payments on a notional balance and in turn received variable interest payments on that notional balance. Payments were settled quarterly on a net basis. While our term loan is unhedged as of June 30, 2012, the risk of variability on our floating interest rate is partially mitigated by the client margin loans, which carry floating interest rates, as well as fees received from the cash sweep programs. At June 30, 2012, our receivables from our advisors’ clients for margin loan activity were approximately $245.4 million, and the balance of deposits in the cash sweep programs was $23.1 billion.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We enter into various off-balance-sheet arrangements in the ordinary course of business, primarily to meet the needs of our advisors’ clients. These arrangements include firm commitments to extend credit. For information on these arrangements, see Notes 10 and 15 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
Contractual Obligations
The following table provides information with respect to our commitments and obligations as of June 30, 2012 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Payments Due by Period |
| Total | | < 1 Year | | 1-3 Years | | 4-5 Years | | > 5 Years |
Leases and other obligations(1) | $ | 391,508 |
| | $ | 29,642 |
| | $ | 56,092 |
| | $ | 52,026 |
| | $ | 253,748 |
|
Senior secured term loan facilities(2) | 1,339,275 |
| | 42,900 |
| | 131,738 |
| | 581,925 |
| | 582,712 |
|
Commitment fee on revolving line of credit(3) | 5,269 |
| | 1,109 |
| | 2,217 |
| | 1,943 |
| | — |
|
Variable interest payments(4): | | | | | | | | | |
Term Loan A | 101,454 |
| | 20,519 |
| | 42,324 |
| | 38,611 |
| | — |
|
Term Loan B | 191,031 |
| | 24,785 |
| | 49,173 |
| | 57,917 |
| | 59,156 |
|
Total contractual cash obligations | $ | 2,028,537 |
| | $ | 118,955 |
| | $ | 281,544 |
| | $ | 732,422 |
| | $ | 895,616 |
|
____________
| |
(1) | Included in the payments due by period is a fifteen year lease commitment that was executed in December 2011 for the Company's future San Diego office building with a lease commencement date of May 1, 2014. Future minimum payments for this lease commitment are $16.9 million, $30.8 million and $228.9 million for the periods 1-3 Years, 4-5 Years and > 5 Years, respectively. Minimum payments have not been reduced by minimum sublease rental income of $5.4 million due in the future under noncancelable subleases. Note 10 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements provides further detail on operating lease |
obligations and obligations under noncancelable service contracts.
| |
(2) | Represents principal payments under our Credit Agreement. See Note 9 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further detail. |
| |
(3) | Represents commitment fees for unused borrowings on our revolving credit facility. See Note 9 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further detail. |
| |
(4) | Our senior secured term loan facilities bear interest at floating rates. Variable interest payments are shown assuming the applicable LIBOR rates at June 30, 2012 remain unchanged. See Note 9 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further detail. |
Our acquisitions of NRP and Concord during the year ended December 31, 2011 involve the potential payment of contingent consideration dependent upon the achievement of certain revenue and gross-margin milestones. The table above does not reflect any such obligation, as the amounts are uncertain. See Note 3 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the maximum amount of future contingent consideration we could be required to pay in connection with these acquisitions.
As of June 30, 2012, we have a liability for unrecognized tax benefits of $21.0 million, which we have netted against income taxes receivable in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of financial condition. This amount has been excluded from the contractual obligations table because we are unable to reasonably predict the ultimate amount or timing of future tax payments.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
We use fair value measurements to record certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value and to determine fair value disclosures.
We use prices obtained from an independent third-party pricing service to measure the fair value of our trading securities. We validate prices received from the pricing service using various methods including, comparison to prices received from additional pricing services, comparison to available market prices and review of other relevant market data including implied yields of major categories of securities.
At June 30, 2012, we did not adjust prices received from the independent third-party pricing service. For certificates of deposit and treasury securities, we utilize market-based inputs including observable market interest rates that correspond to the remaining maturities or next interest reset dates.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We have disclosed in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and in “Item 7-Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, those accounting policies that we consider to be significant in determining our results of operations and financial condition. The accounting principles used in preparing our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements conform in all material respects to GAAP. There have been no material changes to those policies that we consider to be significant since the filing of our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K except for the following:
Revenue Recognition
Substantially all of our revenues are based on contractual arrangements. Revenues are recognized in the periods in which the related services are performed provided that persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Certain portions of our revenues require consideration of the nature of the client relationship in determining whether to recognize the gross amount billed or net amount retained after payments are made to providers for certain services related to the product or service offering. The main factors we use to determine whether to record revenue on a gross or net basis is based on whether:
| |
• | we have a direct contract with the third party provider; |
| |
• | we are the fiduciary in the arrangement; and |
| |
• | we have discretion in establishing fees paid by the customer and fees due to the third party service provider. |
We record commissions earned from customers for purchases of securities including mutual funds, annuity, insurance, equity, fixed income, direct investment, option and commodity transactions on a trade-date basis. Commissions also include mutual fund and variable annuity trails, which are recognized as a percentage of assets under management over the period for which services are performed. A substantial portion of the commissions revenue is ultimately paid to the advisors. Due to the significant volume of mutual fund and variable annuity purchases and sales transacted by financial advisors directly with product manufacturers, management must estimate a portion of its upfront commission and trail revenues for each accounting period for which the proceeds have not yet been received. These estimates are based on a number of factors including market levels, the volume of transactions in prior periods and cash receipts in the current period. We record commissions payable to advisors based upon standard payout ratios for each product for which we have accrued commission revenue.
We record fees charged to customers as advisory fee revenue in advisory accounts where LPL Financial or Independent Advisers Group Corporation is the registered investment advisor. A substantial portion of these advisory fees are paid to the related advisor; such payments are recorded as production expense. Certain advisors conduct their advisory business through separate entities by establishing their own Registered Investment Advisor (“RIA”) pursuant to the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, rather than using our corporate registered RIA. These stand-alone RIAs engage us for technology, clearing, regulatory and custody services, as well as access to our investment advisory platforms. The fee-based production generated by the stand-alone RIA is earned by the advisor, and accordingly not included in our advisory fee revenue. We charge administrative fees based on the value of assets within these advisory accounts, and classify such revenues as asset-based fees and transaction and other fees.
Share-Based Compensation
Certain employees, advisors, officers and directors participate in various stock option plans. In addition, certain financial institutions participate in a warrant plan. Stock options and warrants generally vest in equal increments over a three to five-year period and expire on the 10th anniversary following the date of grant.
We recognize share-based compensation expense related to employee stock option awards based on the grant-date fair value over the requisite service period of the individual grants, which generally equals the vesting period. We account for stock options and warrants awarded to our advisors and financial institutions as commissions and advisory expense based on the fair value of the award at each interim reporting period. If the value of our common stock increases over a given period, this accounting treatment results in additional commissions and advisory expense.
As there are no observable market prices for identical or similar instruments, we estimate fair value using a Black-Scholes valuation model. We must make assumptions regarding the number of share-based awards that will be forfeited. The forfeiture assumption is ultimately adjusted to the actual forfeiture rate. Therefore, changes in the forfeiture assumptions do not impact the total amount of expense ultimately recognized over the vesting period. Rather, different forfeiture assumptions would only impact the timing of expense recognition over the vesting period.
The risk-free interest rates are based on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury constant maturities in effect at the time of the grant with remaining terms equivalent to the respective expected terms of the options. Options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2012 and in periods prior were granted before the declaration of our special dividend and announcement of our intention, subject in each instance to board approval, to pay regular quarterly dividends. Therefore, those options had an expected dividend yield of zero. For any options granted after the March 30, 2012 announcement regarding regular quarterly dividends, the dividend yield is based on an expected dividend of $0.48 per share per year as a percentage of our stock price on the valuation date. We estimate the expected term for our employee option awards using the simplified method in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 110, Certain Assumptions Used in Valuation Methods, because we do not have sufficient relevant historical information to develop reasonable expectations about future exercise patterns. We estimate the expected term for stock options and warrants awarded to our advisors using the contractual term. Beginning in the first quarter of 2012, we base our assumptions about stock-price volatility not only on the stock-price volatility of comparable companies, but also on the historical trading data for the period of time there was a public market for our stock and the implied volatility to buy and sell our stock. We will continue to use peer group volatility information until our historical volatility is sufficient to measure expected volatility for future grants. In the future, as we gain historical data for volatility of our stock and the actual term over which employees hold our options, expected volatility and the expected term may change, which could substantially change the grant-date fair value of future awards of stock options and, ultimately, compensation recorded on future grants.
We recognized $8.5 million and $7.1 million of share-based compensation related to the vesting of employee stock option awards during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. These amounts may not be representative of future share-based compensation expense since the estimated fair value of stock options is amortized over the requisite service period using the straight-line method and additional options may be granted in future years. The following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in calculating the fair value of our employee stock options with the Black-Scholes valuation model that have been granted during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011:
|
| | | | | | | |
| Six Months Ended June 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
Expected life (in years) | 6.49 |
| | 6.50 |
|
Expected stock price volatility | 45.76 | % | | 48.61 | % |
Expected dividend yield | 0.17 | % | | — | % |
Fair value of options | $ | 14.71 |
| | $ | 17.54 |
|
Risk-free interest rate | 1.36 | % | | 2.58 | % |
We recognized $2.8 million and $1.9 million of share-based compensation during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to the vesting of stock options and warrants awarded to our advisors and financial institutions. These amounts may not be representative of future share-based compensation expense since additional options may be granted in future years, our stock price is subject to market fluctuations and the estimated fair value of stock options is amortized over the requisite service period using the straight-line method. The fair value of each option or warrant grant awarded to advisors and financial institutions is estimated on the date of grant and revalued at each interim reporting period using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used as of June 30, 2012 and 2011:
|
| | | | | | | |
| As of June 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
Expected life (in years) | 7.94 |
| | 8.41 |
|
Expected stock price volatility | 44.15 | % | | 47.65 | % |
Expected dividend yield | 1.42 | % | | — | % |
Fair value of options | $ | 15.98 |
| | $ | 21.56 |
|
Risk-free interest rate | 1.35 | % | | 2.45 | % |
We have assumed an annualized forfeiture rate for our stock options and warrants based on a combined review of industry and employee turnover data, as well as an analytical review performed of historical pre-vesting forfeitures occurring over the previous year. We record additional expense if the actual forfeiture rate is lower than estimated and record a recovery of prior expense if the actual forfeiture is higher than estimated.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 2 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion of recent accounting standards and pronouncements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market Risk
We maintain trading securities owned and securities sold, but not yet purchased in order to facilitate client transactions, to meet a portion of our clearing deposit requirements at various clearing organizations, and to track the performance of our research models. These securities include mutual funds, debt securities issued by the U.S. government, money market funds, corporate debt securities, certificates of deposit and equity securities.
Changes in the value of our trading inventory may result from fluctuations in interest rates, credit ratings of the issuer, equity prices and the correlation among these factors. We manage our trading inventory by product type.
Our activities to facilitate client transactions generally involve mutual fund activities, including dividend reinvestments. The balances are based upon pending client activities which are monitored by our broker dealer support services department. Because these positions arise from pending client transactions, there are no specific trading or position limits. Positions held to meet clearing deposit requirements consist of U.S. government securities. The amount of securities deposited depends upon the requirements of the clearing organization. The level of securities deposited is monitored by the settlement area within our broker dealer support services department. Our research department develops model portfolios that are used by advisors in developing client portfolios. We currently maintain approximately 175 accounts based on model portfolios. At the time the portfolio is developed, we purchase the securities in that model portfolio in an amount equal to the account minimum for a client. Account minimums vary by product and can range from $10,000 to $50,000 per model. We utilize these positions to track the performance of the research department. The limits on this activity are based at the inception of each new model.
At June 30, 2012, the fair value of our trading securities owned were $6.9 million. Securities sold, but not yet purchased were $0.4 million at June 30, 2012. See Note 5 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for information regarding the fair value of trading securities owned and securities sold, but not yet purchased associated with our client facilitation activities. See Note 6 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for information regarding the fair value of securities held to maturity.
We do not enter into contracts involving derivatives or other similar financial instruments for trading or proprietary purposes.
We also have market risk on the fees we earn that are based on the market value of advisory and brokerage assets, assets on which trail commissions are paid and assets eligible for sponsor payments.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to risk associated with changes in interest rates. As of June 30, 2012, all of the outstanding debt under our Credit Agreement, $1.3 billion, was subject to floating interest rate risk. While our senior secured term loans are subject to increases in interest rates, we do not believe that a short-term change in interest rates would have a material impact on our income before taxes.
The following table summarizes the impact of increasing interest rates on our interest expense from our debt outstanding at variable interest rates at June 30, 2012 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Outstanding at | | Annual Impact of an Interest Rate Increase of |
| | Variable Interest | | 10 Basis | | 25 Basis | | 50 Basis | | 100 Basis |
Senior Secured Term Loans | | Rates | | Points | | Points | | Points | | Points |
Term Loan A(1) | | $ | 725,813 |
| | $ | 712 |
| | $ | 1,780 |
| | $ | 3,560 |
| | $ | 7,120 |
|
Term Loan B(2) | | 613,462 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,499 |
|
Variable Rate Debt Outstanding | | $ | 1,339,275 |
| | $ | 712 |
| | $ | 1,780 |
| | $ | 3,560 |
| | $ | 8,619 |
|
_______________________
| |
(1) | The variable interest rate for our Term Loan A is based on the one-month LIBOR of 0.25%, plus the applicable interest rate margin of 2.50%. |
| |
(2) | The variable interest rate for our Term Loan B is based on the greater of the one-month LIBOR of 0.25% or 1.00%, plus the applicable interest rate margin of 3.00%. |
We offer our advisors and their clients two primary cash sweep programs that are interest rate sensitive: our insured cash programs and money market sweep vehicles involving multiple money market fund providers. Our insured cash programs use multiple non-affiliated banks to provide up to $1.5 million ($3.0 million in joint accounts) of FDIC insurance for client deposits custodied at the banks. While clients earn interest for balances on deposit in the insured cash programs, we earn a fee. Our fees from the insured cash programs are based on prevailing interest rates in the current interest rate environment. Changes in interest rates and fees for the insured cash programs are monitored by our fee and rate setting committee (the “FRS committee”), which governs and approves any changes to our fees. By meeting promptly after interest rates change, or for other market or non-market reasons, the FRS committee balances financial risk of the insured cash programs with products that offer competitive client yields. However, as short-term interest rates hit lower levels, the FRS committee may be compelled to lower fees.
The average Federal Reserve effective federal funds rate ("FFER") for June 2012 was 0.16%. The following table reflects the approximate annual impact to asset-based fees on our insured cash programs (assuming that client balances at June 30, 2012 remain unchanged) of an upward or downward change in short-term interest rates of one basis point (dollars in thousands):
|
| | | | | |
Federal Reserve Effective Federal Funds Rate | | Annualized Increase or Decrease in Asset-Based Fees per One Basis Point Change |
0.00% - 0.25% | | | $ | 1,500 |
|
0.26% - 1.25% | | | 700 |
|
1.26% - 2.00% | | | 600 |
|
The actual impact to asset-based fees, including a change in the FFER of greater than 2.00%, may vary depending on the FRS committee's strategy in response to a change in interest rate levels, the significance of a change, and actual balances at the time of such change.
Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk of loss due to adverse changes in a borrower’s, issuer’s or counterparty’s ability to meet its financial obligations under contractual or agreed upon terms. We bear credit risk on the activities of our advisors’ clients, including the execution, settlement, and financing of various transactions on behalf of these clients.
These activities are transacted on either a cash or margin basis. Our credit exposure in these transactions consists primarily of margin accounts, through which we extend credit to clients collateralized by cash (for purposes of margin lending, cash is not used as collateral) and securities in the client’s account. Under many of these agreements, we are permitted to sell or repledge these securities held as collateral and use these securities to enter into securities lending arrangements or to deliver to counterparties to cover short positions.
As our advisors execute margin transactions on behalf of their clients, we may incur losses if clients do not fulfill their obligations, the collateral in the client’s account is insufficient to fully cover losses from such investments and our advisors fail to reimburse us for such losses. Our loss on margin accounts is immaterial and did not exceed $0.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011. We monitor exposure to industry sectors and individual securities and perform analyses on a regular basis in connection with our margin lending activities. We adjust our margin requirements if we believe our risk exposure is not appropriate based on market conditions.
We are subject to concentration risk if we extend large loans to or have large commitments with a single counterparty, borrower, or group of similar counterparties or borrowers (e.g. in the same industry). Receivables from and payables to clients and stock borrowing and lending activities are conducted with a large number of clients and counterparties and potential concentration is carefully monitored. We seek to limit this risk through careful review of the underlying business and the use of limits established by senior management, taking into consideration factors including the financial strength of the counterparty, the size of the position or commitment, the expected duration of the position or commitment and other positions or commitments outstanding.
Operational Risk
Operational risk generally refers to the risk of loss resulting from our operations, including, but not limited to, improper or unauthorized execution and processing of transactions, deficiencies in our technology or financial operating systems and inadequacies or breaches in our control processes. We operate in diverse markets and are reliant on the ability of our employees and systems to process a large number of transactions. These risks are less direct and quantifiable than credit and market risk, but managing them is critical, particularly in a rapidly changing environment with increasing transaction volumes. In the event of a breakdown or improper operation of systems or improper action by employees or advisors, we could suffer financial loss, regulatory sanctions and damage to our reputation. Business continuity plans exist for critical systems, and redundancies are built into the systems as deemed appropriate. In order to mitigate and control operational risk, we have developed and continue to enhance specific policies and procedures that are designed to identify and manage operational risk at appropriate levels throughout our organization and within various departments. These control mechanisms attempt to ensure that operational policies and procedures are being followed and that our employees and advisors operate within established corporate policies and limits.
Risk Management
We have established various committees of the Board of Directors to manage the risks associated with our business. Our Audit Committee was established for the primary purpose of overseeing (i) the integrity of our unaudited and audited condensed consolidated financial statements, (ii) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements that may impact our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements or financial operations, (iii) the independent auditor’s qualifications and independence and (iv) the performance of our independent auditor and internal audit function. Our Compensation and Human Resources Committee was established for the primary purpose of (i) overseeing our efforts to attract, retain and motivate members of our senior management team in partnership with the Chief Executive Officer, (ii) to carry out the Board’s overall responsibility relating to the determination of compensation for all executive officers to achieve the proper risk-reward balance and not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk-taking, (iii) to oversee all other aspects of our compensation and human resource policies and (iv) to oversee our management resources, succession planning and management development activities. As mandated by the Audit Committee, we also have established a Risk Oversight Committee comprised of a group of our senior-most executives to oversee the risk management activities of the Company.
In addition to various committees, we have written policies and procedures that govern the conduct of business by our advisors, our employees, our relationship with advisors' clients and the terms and conditions of our relationships with product manufacturers. Our client and advisor policies address the extension of credit for client accounts, data and physical security, compliance with industry regulation and codes of ethics to govern employee and advisor conduct among other matters.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Disclosure Committee, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report were effective.
Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the second quarter ended June 30, 2012, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Information regarding the Company’s risks is set forth under Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Company’s 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The table below sets forth information regarding repurchases on a monthly basis during the second quarter of 2012:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Period | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs(1) | | Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Programs |
April 1, 2012 through April 30, 2012 | — |
| | $ | — |
| | — |
| | $ | 23,522,765 |
|
May 1, 2012 through May 31, 2012(2) | 354,986 |
| | $ | 33.66 |
| | 354,986 |
| | $ | 86,575,225 |
|
June 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 | 200,000 |
| | $ | 32.30 |
| | 200,000 |
| | $ | 80,115,305 |
|
April 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012 | 554,986 |
| | $ | 33.17 |
| | 554,986 |
| | $ | 80,115,305 |
|
____________________
| |
(1) | The repurchase of shares was executed under the share repurchase program approved by the Board of Directors on August 16, 2011, through which the Company may repurchase $70.0 million of its outstanding shares of common stock through August 31, 2012. See Note 11 of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information. |
| |
(2) | On May 25, 2012, the Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program pursuant to which the Company may repurchase an additional $75.0 million of its outstanding shares of common stock. See Note 11 of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None.
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
| | | |
3.1 |
| | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the registration statement on Form S-1 (File Number 333-167325) on July 9, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference) |
3.2 |
| | Certificate of Ownership and Merger (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File Number 001-34963) on June 19, 2012, and incorporated herein by reference) |
3.3 |
| | Third Amended and Restated Bylaws (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File Number 001-34963) on June 19, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference)
|
4.1 |
| | Amendment and Waiver to the Management Stockholders' Agreement by and between Robert J. Moore and LPL Investment Holdings Inc. dated May 30, 2012 (previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K (File Number 001-34963) on June 5, 2012 and incorporated here by reference) |
31.1 |
| | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith) |
31.2 |
| | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith) |
32.1 |
| | Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith) |
32.2 |
| | Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith) |
|
| | |
101.INS |
| | XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH |
| | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
101.CAL |
| | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation |
101.LAB |
| | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label |
101.PRE |
| | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation |
101.DEF |
| | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
| | | |
| | LPL Financial Holdings Inc. |
Date: | August 1, 2012 | By: | /s/ MARK S. CASADY |
| | | Mark S. Casady |
| | | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
| | | |
Date: | August 1, 2012 | By: | /s/ DAN H. ARNOLD |
| | | Dan H. Arnold |
| | | Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 4.1 2012.06.30
Exhibit 4.1
AMENDMENT AND WAIVER TO
MANAGEMENT STOCKHOLDERS' AGREEMENT
This Amendment and Waiver Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of May 31, 2012 by and between LPL Investment Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) and Robert J. Moore.
WHEREAS, on November 23, 2010, the Company entered into a Management Stockholders' Agreement with Stephanie L. Brown, Mark S. Casady, William E. Dwyer III, Robert J. Moore and Esther M. Stearns (the “Agreement”) setting forth, among other things, certain transfer restrictions;
WHEREAS, in accordance with Section 4.02 of the Agreement, the Company and Robert J. Moore wish to amend the Agreement to remove Mr. Moore as a party thereto and waive the restrictions and obligations of the Agreement with respect to Mr. Moore;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
1. Amendment and Waiver. The Agreement is hereby amended to remove Robert J. Moore as a party thereto. The Company hereby waives all restrictions and obligations contained in the Agreement as they pertain to Robert J. Moore, including the transfer restrictions set forth in Section 2.01 of the Agreement.
2. Miscellaneous.
2.01 Severability. If any provision of this Amendment shall be declared by any court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, void or unenforceable, all other provisions of this Agreement, to the extent permitted by law, shall not be affected and shall remain in full force and effect. Upon any such determination, the parties shall negotiate in good faith in an effort to agree upon a suitable and equitable substitute provision to effect the original intent of the parties.
2.02 Entire Agreement. Except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, the Agreement, as modified by this Amendment, embodies the complete agreement and understanding among the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes and preempts any prior understandings, agreements or representations by or among the parties, written or oral, that may have related to the subject matter hereof in any way.
2.03 Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in separate counterparts each of which shall be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same agreement.
2.04 Governing Law; Consent to Jurisdiction.
(a) This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware. The parties hereto agree that any suit, action or proceeding (“Litigation”) seeking to enforce any provision of, or based on any matter arising out of or in connection with, the Agreement or this Amendment or the transactions contemplated thereby or hereby shall be brought in any federal court located in the State of Delaware or any Delaware state court. Each of the parties hereto hereby irrevocably and unconditionally waives, and agrees not to assert, by way of motion, as a defense, counterclaim or otherwise, in any such Litigation, the defense of sovereign immunity, any claim that it is not personally subject to the jurisdiction of the aforesaid
courts for any reason, other than the failure to serve process in accordance with this Section 2.04, that it or its property is exempt or immune from jurisdiction of any such court or from any legal process commenced in such courts (whether through service of notice, attachment prior to judgment, attachment in aid of execution of judgment, execution of judgment or otherwise), and to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, that the Litigation in any such court is brought in an inconvenient forum, that the venue of such Litigation is improper, or that this Amendment, or the subject matter hereof, may not be enforced in or by such particular courts and further irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the benefit of any defense that would hinder, fetter or delay the levy, execution or collection of any amount to which the party is entitled pursuant to the final judgment of any court having jurisdiction. Each of the parties irrevocably and unconditionally waives, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any and all rights to trial by jury in connection with any Litigation arising out of or relating to the Agreement or this Amendment or the transactions contemplated thereby or hereby.
(b) Each of the parties hereto irrevocably consents to the service of process out of any of the aforementioned courts in any such Litigation by the mailing of copies thereof by registered mail, postage prepaid, to such party at its address set forth in the Agreement, such service of process to be effective upon acknowledgment of receipt of such registered mail.
(c) The parties hereto each expressly acknowledge that the foregoing waivers are intended to be irrevocable under the laws of the State of Delaware and of the United States of America; provided that consent by the parties hereto to jurisdiction and service contained in this Section 2.04 solely for the purpose referred to in this Section 2.04 and shall not be deemed to be a general submission to said courts or in the State of Delaware other than for such purpose.
2.05 Interpretation. The headings contained in this Amendment are for reference purposes only and shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Amendment or the Agreement.
2.06 Effect of Amendment. This Amendment modifies only the obligations of the parties hereto and shall not be considered a modification of the rights of any other Executive (as defined in the Agreement) party to the Agreement. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the terms of this Amendment and the terms of the Agreement, the terms of this Amendment will control. Except to the extent expressly modified herein or in conflict with the terms of this Amendment, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment and Waiver Agreement as of the date first above written.
|
| | | | | | | |
| ROBERT J. MOORE | | LPL INVESTMENT HOLDINGS INC. | |
| | | | | | | |
| /s/ Robert J. Moore | | By: | /s/ Stephanie L. Brown | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | Name: | Stephanie L. Brown | |
| | | Title: | Secretary | |
Exhibit 31.1 2012.06.30
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
I, Mark S. Casady, certify that:
| |
1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LPL Financial Holdings Inc.; |
| |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| |
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| |
a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| |
b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| |
c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
| |
d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
| |
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| |
a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
| |
b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 1, 2012
|
| | | |
/s/ Mark S. Casady | |
| | | |
Mark S. Casady | |
Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) | |
Exhibit 31.2 2012.06.30
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
I, Dan H. Arnold, certify that:
| |
1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LPL Financial Holdings Inc.; |
| |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
| |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
| |
4. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
| |
a. | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
| |
b. | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
| |
c. | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
| |
d. | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and |
| |
5. | The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
| |
a. | All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
| |
b. | Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: August 1, 2012
|
| | | |
/s/ Dan H. Arnold | |
| | | |
Dan H. Arnold | |
Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) | |
Exhibit 32.1 2012.06.30
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark S. Casady, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| |
1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
| |
2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
Date: August 1, 2012
|
| | | |
/s/ Mark S. Casady | |
| | | |
Mark S. Casady | |
Chief Executive Officer | |
Exhibit 32.2 2012.06.30
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of LPL Financial Holdings Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dan H. Arnold, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| |
1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
| |
2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
Date: August 1, 2012
|
| | | |
/s/ Dan H. Arnold | |
| | | |
Dan H. Arnold | |
Chief Financial Officer | |